Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Author
Cronin, John | 2 |
Dahlin, Michael | 2 |
Xiang, Yun | 2 |
Durant, Sarah | 1 |
McCahon, Donna | 1 |
Publication Type
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Elementary Secondary Education | 2 |
Grade 3 | 2 |
Grade 8 | 2 |
Elementary Education | 1 |
Grade 4 | 1 |
Grade 5 | 1 |
Grade 6 | 1 |
Grade 7 | 1 |
Middle Schools | 1 |
Audience
Location
Arizona | 1 |
California | 1 |
Colorado | 1 |
Delaware | 1 |
Florida | 1 |
Georgia | 1 |
Idaho | 1 |
Illinois | 1 |
Indiana | 1 |
Kansas | 1 |
Maine | 1 |
More ▼ |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
No Child Left Behind Act 2001 | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Dahlin, Michael; Xiang, Yun; Durant, Sarah; Cronin, John – Northwest Evaluation Association, 2010
The goal of the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) was to ensure that states set educational standards in core academic subjects, and to hold schools accountable for ensuring that all students meet these standards. Given the inflexibility of NCLB's AYP (adequate yearly progress) targets and the federal line drawn in the sand for 2014, critics have…
Descriptors: Federal Legislation, State Standards, Academic Standards, Accountability
Cronin, John; Dahlin, Michael; Xiang, Yun; McCahon, Donna – Thomas B. Fordham Institute, 2009
The intent of the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act of 2001 is to hold schools accountable for ensuring that all their students achieve mastery in reading and math, with a particular focus on groups that have traditionally been left behind. Under NCLB, states have leeway to: (1) Craft their own academic standards, select their own tests, and define…
Descriptors: Federal Legislation, Educational Improvement, Educational Indicators, Federal Programs