Descriptor
| Benchmarking | 1 |
| Clinical Diagnosis | 1 |
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| Cutting Scores | 1 |
| Grade 1 | 1 |
| Grade 2 | 1 |
| Grade 3 | 1 |
| High Stakes Tests | 1 |
| Longitudinal Studies | 1 |
| Predictive Validity | 1 |
| Reading Tests | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| School Psychology Review | 1 |
Author
| Hintze, John M. | 1 |
| Silberglitt, Benjamin | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Elementary Education | 1 |
| Grade 1 | 1 |
| Grade 2 | 1 |
| Grade 3 | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Minnesota Comprehensive… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkHintze, John M.; Silberglitt, Benjamin – School Psychology Review, 2005
The purpose of this study was to compare different statistical and methodological approaches to standard setting and determining cut scores using R-CBM and performance on high-stakes tests. One thousand seven hundred and sixty-six students were followed longitudinally from first through third grades using R-CBM benchmark assessment. In addition,…
Descriptors: Predictive Validity, High Stakes Tests, Standard Setting, Clinical Diagnosis
