Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Automation | 1 |
| Computer Assisted Testing | 1 |
| Curriculum Based Assessment | 1 |
| Elementary School Students | 1 |
| Grade 2 | 1 |
| Grade 3 | 1 |
| Grade 4 | 1 |
| Oral Reading | 1 |
| Predictor Variables | 1 |
| Readability | 1 |
| Readability Formulas | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Grantee Submission | 1 |
Publication Type
| Reports - Research | 1 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
| Early Childhood Education | 1 |
| Elementary Education | 1 |
| Grade 2 | 1 |
| Grade 3 | 1 |
| Grade 4 | 1 |
| Intermediate Grades | 1 |
| Primary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Oregon | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Flesch Kincaid Grade Level… | 1 |
| easyCBM | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Download full textNese, Joseph F. T.; Kahn, Josh; Kamata, Akihito – Grantee Submission, 2017
Despite prevalent use and practical application, the current and standard assessment of oral reading fluency (ORF) presents considerable limitations which reduces its validity in estimating growth and monitoring student progress, including: (a) high cost of implementation; (b) tenuous passage equivalence; and (c) bias, large standard error, and…
Descriptors: Automation, Speech, Recognition (Psychology), Scores
