Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
| Elementary School Students | 3 |
| Middle School Students | 3 |
| Common Core State Standards | 2 |
| Curriculum Based Assessment | 2 |
| Grade 1 | 2 |
| Grade 2 | 2 |
| Grade 3 | 2 |
| Grade 4 | 2 |
| Grade 5 | 2 |
| Grade 6 | 2 |
| Grade 7 | 2 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Behavioral Research and… | 3 |
Publication Type
| Reports - Research | 2 |
| Numerical/Quantitative Data | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
| Elementary Education | 3 |
| Grade 1 | 3 |
| Grade 2 | 3 |
| Grade 3 | 3 |
| Grade 4 | 3 |
| Grade 5 | 3 |
| Grade 6 | 3 |
| Grade 7 | 3 |
| Grade 8 | 3 |
| Middle Schools | 3 |
| Early Childhood Education | 2 |
| More ▼ | |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Download full textNese, Joseph F. T.; Anderson, Daniel; Irvin, P. Shawn; Alonzo, Julie – Behavioral Research and Teaching, 2018
This in-brief technical report documents the results from two different analytic approaches for examining the reliability of the slope for easyCBM® math measures in Grades K-8. Results varied by grade, assessment measure, and the analytic approach. Results patterns are discussed.
Descriptors: Curriculum Based Assessment, Response to Intervention, Elementary School Students, Mathematics Achievement
Nese, Joseph F. T.; Anderson, Daniel; Irvin, P. Shawn; Alonzo, Julie – Behavioral Research and Teaching, 2018
This in-brief technical report documents the results from two different analytic approaches for examining the reliability of the slope for easyCBM® reading measures in Grades K-8. Results varied by grade, assessment measure, and the analytic approach. Results patterns are discussed.
Descriptors: Curriculum Based Assessment, Response to Intervention, Kindergarten, Grade 1
Alonzo, Julie; Anderson, Daniel; Tindal, Gerald – Behavioral Research and Teaching, 2009
We present scaling outcomes for mathematics assessments used in the fall to screen students at risk of failing to learn the knowledge and skills described in the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM) Focal Point Standards. At each grade level, the assessment consisted of a 48-item test with three 16-item sub-test sets aligned to the…
Descriptors: At Risk Students, Mathematics Teachers, National Standards, Item Response Theory
