Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Biology | 1 |
| Biotechnology | 1 |
| Classroom Communication | 1 |
| Debate | 1 |
| Discourse Analysis | 1 |
| Evolution | 1 |
| Genetics | 1 |
| Grade 12 | 1 |
| High School Students | 1 |
| Persuasive Discourse | 1 |
| Science Education | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Science & Education | 1 |
Author
| Anisa | 1 |
| Muslim | 1 |
| Riandi | 1 |
| Widodo, Ari | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Grade 12 | 1 |
| High Schools | 1 |
| Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkAnisa; Widodo, Ari; Riandi; Muslim – Science & Education, 2023
The purpose of this study is to develop a framework for analyzing classroom argumentation that includes a process of rebutting. A most commonly used framework to analyze argument in science education is Toulmin's Argumentation Pattern. It is useful for analyzing argumentation but it cannot represent the complexity of students' rebuttals during…
Descriptors: High School Students, Grade 12, Science Education, Persuasive Discourse
