Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Writing Tests | 3 |
| Comparative Analysis | 2 |
| Correlation | 2 |
| Academic Achievement | 1 |
| Academic Standards | 1 |
| Accountability | 1 |
| Achievement Gains | 1 |
| Adolescents | 1 |
| Alignment (Education) | 1 |
| Automation | 1 |
| Business Administration… | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Reports - Research | 3 |
| Journal Articles | 2 |
Education Level
| Grade 10 | 3 |
| Grade 11 | 3 |
| Grade 12 | 3 |
| Grade 6 | 3 |
| Grade 7 | 3 |
| Grade 8 | 3 |
| Grade 9 | 3 |
| Secondary Education | 2 |
| Elementary Education | 1 |
| Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
| Grade 1 | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Graduate Management Admission… | 1 |
| National Assessment of… | 1 |
| Test of English as a Foreign… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkHall-Mills, Shannon; Apel, Kenn – Communication Disorders Quarterly, 2013
We evaluated the narrative and expository writing samples of 12 adolescents with language-learning disabilities (LLD) in Grades 6 to 12 for elements of microstructure (e.g., productivity, grammatical complexity) and macrostructure (genre-specific text structure elements) using an experimental measure. Writing samples were elicited with…
Descriptors: Learning Disabilities, Writing Tests, Adolescents, Writing Evaluation
Download full textThissen, David; Norton, Scott – American Institutes for Research, 2013
Development of the Common Core State Standards (CCSS), and the creation of the Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium (Smarter Balanced) and the Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC), changes the pattern of accountability testing. These changes raise the question: "How should NAEP's validity and utility be…
Descriptors: National Competency Tests, Psychometrics, State Standards, Academic Standards
Attali, Yigal; Burstein, Jill – ETS Research Report Series, 2005
The e-rater® system has been used by ETS for automated essay scoring since 1999. This paper describes a new version of e-rater (v.2.0) that differs from the previous one (v.1.3) with regard to the feature set and model building approach. The paper describes the new version, compares the new and previous versions in terms of performance, and…
Descriptors: Essay Tests, Automation, Scoring, Comparative Analysis
