Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Comparative Analysis | 2 |
| Grade 10 | 2 |
| Reading | 2 |
| Reading Comprehension | 2 |
| Reading Fluency | 2 |
| Vocabulary | 2 |
| Word Recognition | 2 |
| Adolescents | 1 |
| Content Area Reading | 1 |
| Correlation | 1 |
| Decoding (Reading) | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
| Grade 10 | 2 |
| Secondary Education | 2 |
| Elementary Education | 1 |
| Grade 6 | 1 |
| High Schools | 1 |
| Middle Schools | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
| No Child Left Behind Act 2001 | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkHoien-Tengesdal, Ingjerd; Hoien, Torleiv – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 2012
The purpose of the present study was twofold: First, the authors investigated if an extended version of the component model of reading (CMR; Model 2), including decoding rate and oral vocabulary comprehension, accounted for more of the variance in reading comprehension than the commonly used measures of the cognitive factors in the CMR. Second,…
Descriptors: Reading Comprehension, Reading Fluency, Structural Equation Models, Grade 6
Seifert, Kathleen; Espin, Christine – Learning Disability Quarterly, 2012
This study examined the effects of three types of reading interventions on the science text reading of secondary students with learning disabilities (LD). Twenty 10th-grade students with LD participated in the study. Using a within-subjects design, the relative effects of three different instructional approaches--text reading, vocabulary learning,…
Descriptors: Learning Disabilities, Reading Fluency, Direct Instruction, Vocabulary Development
