Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 1 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| At Risk Students | 1 |
| Beginning Reading | 1 |
| Effect Size | 1 |
| Grade 1 | 1 |
| Meta Analysis | 1 |
| Orthographic Symbols | 1 |
| Phonemic Awareness | 1 |
| Preschool Children | 1 |
| Reading Difficulties | 1 |
| Reading Instruction | 1 |
| Reading Skills | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Florina Erbeli | 1 |
| J. Marc Goodrich | 1 |
| Marianne Rice | 1 |
| Megan E. Bishop | 1 |
| Ying Xu | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Early Childhood Education | 1 |
| Elementary Education | 1 |
| Grade 1 | 1 |
| Primary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkFlorina Erbeli; Marianne Rice; Ying Xu; Megan E. Bishop; J. Marc Goodrich – Scientific Studies of Reading, 2024
Purpose: Research on how much early phonemic awareness (PA) instruction is optimal has produced inconclusive answers. We conducted a nonlinear meta-analysis to estimate the optimal cumulative dosage of early PA instruction on PA outcomes with an associated maximum effect size in preschool through first-grade students. Method: Sixteen experimental…
Descriptors: Meta Analysis, Reading Instruction, Phonemic Awareness, Beginning Reading
