Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 1 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 4 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 5 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 5 |
Descriptor
Source
Editorial Projects in… | 1 |
Educational and Psychological… | 1 |
European Journal of… | 1 |
Grantee Submission | 1 |
Leadership and Policy in… | 1 |
Author
Chun Wang | 1 |
DeMatthews, David E. | 1 |
Jing Lu | 1 |
Ningzhong Shi | 1 |
Peng, Luyao | 1 |
Serafini, Amy | 1 |
Sinharay, Sandip | 1 |
Vista, Alvin | 1 |
Publication Type
Reports - Research | 4 |
Journal Articles | 3 |
Collected Works - Serial | 1 |
Education Level
Elementary Education | 5 |
Intermediate Grades | 3 |
Grade 4 | 2 |
Early Childhood Education | 1 |
Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
Grade 5 | 1 |
Kindergarten | 1 |
Middle Schools | 1 |
Primary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Texas | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
National Assessment of… | 1 |
Progress in International… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
The Use of Theory of Linear Mixed-Effects Models to Detect Fraudulent Erasures at an Aggregate Level
Peng, Luyao; Sinharay, Sandip – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2022
Wollack et al. (2015) suggested the erasure detection index (EDI) for detecting fraudulent erasures for individual examinees. Wollack and Eckerly (2017) and Sinharay (2018) extended the index of Wollack et al. (2015) to suggest three EDIs for detecting fraudulent erasures at the aggregate or group level. This article follows up on the research of…
Descriptors: Cheating, Identification, Statistical Analysis, Testing
Editorial Projects in Education, 2024
Addressing academic integrity in the age of AI is essential to ensure honesty and student success. This Spotlight will help you learn about how educators nationwide are approaching AI in teaching and learning; review data investigating how many students are actually using AI to cheat; examine strategies teachers are using to fight AI cheating;…
Descriptors: Integrity, Artificial Intelligence, Teaching Methods, Computer Software
Jing Lu; Chun Wang; Ningzhong Shi – Grantee Submission, 2023
In high-stakes, large-scale, standardized tests with certain time limits, examinees are likely to engage in either one of the three types of behavior (e.g., van der Linden & Guo, 2008; Wang & Xu, 2015): solution behavior, rapid guessing behavior, and cheating behavior. Oftentimes examinees do not always solve all items due to various…
Descriptors: High Stakes Tests, Standardized Tests, Guessing (Tests), Cheating
Vista, Alvin – European Journal of Educational Research, 2019
Cheating detection is an important issue in standardized testing, especially in large-scale settings. Statistical approaches are often computationally intensive and require specialised software to conduct. We present a two-stage approach that quickly filters suspected groups using statistical testing on an IRT-based answer-copying index. We also…
Descriptors: Cheating, Identification, Computer Software, Standardized Tests
DeMatthews, David E.; Serafini, Amy – Leadership and Policy in Schools, 2021
Cheating and unethical behavior in the context of high-stakes accountability has been well documented. Recently, the US Department of Education found Texas schools failing to comply with the nation's special education law as a result of a state accountability policy. This article examines how a group of principals recognized for their…
Descriptors: Ethics, Principals, Administrator Behavior, Special Education