Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Academic Standards | 1 |
| Criticism | 1 |
| Educational Quality | 1 |
| Ethics | 1 |
| Integrity | 1 |
| Peer Evaluation | 1 |
| Performance Factors | 1 |
| Quality Assurance | 1 |
| Quality Control | 1 |
| Reflection | 1 |
| Value Judgment | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Journal of Research… | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Opinion Papers | 1 |
Education Level
| Adult Education | 1 |
| Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
| Higher Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Download full text
Direct linkRoberts, Thomas J.; Shambrook, Jennifer – Journal of Research Administration, 2012
Academic peer review is widely viewed as fair, equitable, and essential to academic quality. Successfully completing the process through publication or award is widely deemed as one of the most rigorous and prestigious forms of scholarly accomplishment. Despite this sentiment the academic peer review process is not without fault. It is criticized…
Descriptors: Peer Evaluation, Integrity, Ethics, Reflection
