Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 12 |
Descriptor
Peer Evaluation | 12 |
Scientific Research | 12 |
Grants | 4 |
Researchers | 4 |
Authors | 2 |
Bias | 2 |
College Faculty | 2 |
Communities of Practice | 2 |
Decision Making | 2 |
Ethnography | 2 |
Feedback (Response) | 2 |
More ▼ |
Source
Author
Hugo Horta | 2 |
João M. Santos | 2 |
April M. Taylor | 1 |
Ayse Oguz Unver | 1 |
Burcu Senler | 1 |
Elizabeth Day | 1 |
Enxi Jin | 1 |
Eric M. Rubenstein | 1 |
Hasan Zuhtu Okulu | 1 |
James B. Olesen | 1 |
Jamie Shaw | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 11 |
Reports - Research | 7 |
Reports - Evaluative | 3 |
Books | 1 |
Guides - General | 1 |
Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 4 |
Postsecondary Education | 4 |
Audience
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Hugo Horta; João M. Santos – Studies in Higher Education, 2024
Research productivity is a common topic in the literature, but peer reviewing for journals has received less attention, although it is a key activity of academic research. We help to fill this knowledge gap by assessing the determinants of peer review engagement and quality in scientific journals. We do so by analysing the combined information…
Descriptors: Peer Evaluation, Scientific Research, Periodicals, Sustainability
Jeffrey Wayne Elias – APA Books, 2024
Scientific research relies on funding, and everyone who conducts research must become adept at funding their research. This book explains how to attain the number one source of research funding: grants. Readers will learn how to prepare grant proposals, how and when to interact with funding institutions, how to interpret and respond to peer review…
Descriptors: Grants, Grantsmanship, Program Proposals, Scientific Research
Lambros Roumbanis – Minerva: A Review of Science, Learning and Policy, 2024
A critical debate has blossomed within the field of research policy, science and technology studies, and philosophy of science regarding the possible benefits and limitations of allocating extramural grants using a lottery system. The most common view among those supporting the lottery idea is that some form of modified lottery is acceptable, if…
Descriptors: Peer Evaluation, Scientific Research, Policy, Grants
Elizabeth Day; Karen Bogenschneider – Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice, 2024
Background: Understanding how policymakers define research and differentiate it from other sources of data is critical for scientists to improve how they conduct and communicate research to policy audiences. Yet, few studies have explicitly asked policymakers -- particularly state legislators in the USA -- how they define research evidence.…
Descriptors: Policy Formation, Legislators, State Legislation, Scientific Research
Vincent Denault – International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education (QSE), 2024
Despite decades of research and thousands of peer-reviewed articles on nonverbal communication written by a worldwide community of academics, a number of people in position of power, including security, justice and legal practitioners have embraced "body language" pseudoscience. This autoethnography aims to offer an otherwise…
Descriptors: Scientific Research, Misconceptions, Nonverbal Communication, Computer Mediated Communication
Jamie Shaw – Research Evaluation, 2024
There has been a recent increase in attention toward the proper targets of evaluation in science funding policy. Specifically, some claim that we should 'fund people, not projects' to allow for increased autonomy for researchers. Critics argue that this movement unduly opens room for biases against several marginalized groups of scientists. In…
Descriptors: Scientific Research, Grants, Financial Support, Researchers
Matthew Falconer – Written Communication, 2024
Governments the world over require scientific knowledge to inform policy makers' decision-making processes. The recontextualization of this information for nonscientific audiences has received much attention, though it has primarily focused on publicly available texts. Little is known about the discursive nature of how science is transformed and…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Science Education, Educational Policy, Policy Formation
Enxi Jin; Xiaohua Jiang – Research Evaluation, 2024
In response to the escalating reliance on bibliometrics for research evaluation within Chinese universities, this study delves into the far-reaching impact of this trend. Through comprehensive interviews with 15 academics from research-intensive universities encompassing diverse demographics, including gender, age, academic rank, and knowledge…
Descriptors: Bibliometrics, Scientific Research, Universities, College Faculty
João M. Santos – Research Evaluation, 2024
The allocation of scientific funding through grant programs is crucial for research advancement. While independent peer panels typically handle evaluations, their decisions can lean on personal preferences that go beyond the stated criteria, leading to inconsistencies and potential biases. Given these concerns, our study employs a novel method,…
Descriptors: Grants, Program Proposals, Funding Formulas, Scientific Research
Ayse Oguz Unver; Hasan Zuhtu Okulu; Onur Bektas; Yasemin Ozdem Yilmaz; Nilay Muslu; Burcu Senler; Sertac Arabacioglu – School Science and Mathematics, 2024
Several observation protocols in different theoretical frameworks and components have been designed and validated by teacher trainers and professional development providers to capture and categorize observational data on the characteristics and level of inquiry in science practices. However, certain constraints limit their wide use, such as the…
Descriptors: Faculty Development, Classroom Observation Techniques, Science Instruction, Teaching Methods
Hugo Horta; Jisun Jung – Higher Education Quarterly, 2024
Peer review in journals is in crisis, and its current situation and sustainability are increasingly concerning for academics and scientific communities. We identify this crisis as part of an evolutionary step in the continuous development of science, arguing that peer review maintains a central role. We analyse the emergence and historical…
Descriptors: Peer Evaluation, Periodicals, Scientific and Technical Information, Scientific Research
Lisa DaVia Rubenstein; Kelsey A. Woodruff; April M. Taylor; James B. Olesen; Philip J. Smaldino; Eric M. Rubenstein – Journal of Advanced Academics, 2024
Primarily undergraduate institutions (PUI) often struggle to provide authentic research opportunities that culminate in peer-reviewed publications due to "recipe-driven" lab courses and the comprehensive body of work necessary for traditional scientific publication. However, the advent of short-form, single-figure…
Descriptors: Undergraduate Students, Student Research, Peer Evaluation, Scientific Research