NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 3 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Da-Wei Zhang; Melissa Boey; Yan Yu Tan; Alexis Hoh Sheng Jia – npj Science of Learning, 2024
This study evaluates the ability of large language models (LLMs) to deliver criterion-based grading and examines the impact of prompt engineering with detailed criteria on grading. Using well-established human benchmarks and quantitative analyses, we found that even free LLMs achieve criterion-based grading with a detailed understanding of the…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Natural Language Processing, Criterion Referenced Tests, Grading
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Liang Liao – Teaching in Higher Education, 2024
This study explores how assessment criteria are applied in grading student work. It is found that explicit assessment criteria do not work as authoritative guidance as expected and that tacit criteria are more decisive in awarding a certain grade. Various sources that form idiosyncratic tacit criteria are identified. These sources, including…
Descriptors: Student Evaluation, Grading, Criterion Referenced Tests, Criteria
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Jingxuan Liu; Michelle Wong; Bridgette Hard – Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 2024
The present study examined how information about different grading systems affects students' course expectations, particularly in ways that may have downstream consequences for learning and other academic outcomes. In an online experiment using a preregistered design, we prompted two samples of current and recent college students (N = 547) with a…
Descriptors: Norm Referenced Tests, Criterion Referenced Tests, Grading, Student Attitudes