Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 1 |
Descriptor
| Deception | 1 |
| Ethics | 1 |
| Evidence | 1 |
| Medical Research | 1 |
| Periodicals | 1 |
| Qualitative Research | 1 |
| Research Methodology | 1 |
| Synthesis | 1 |
Source
| Research Synthesis Methods | 1 |
Author
| Amanda Ross-White | 1 |
| Anna M. Scott | 1 |
| Ashley Whitehorn | 1 |
| Cindy Stern | 1 |
| Danielle Pollock | 1 |
| Edoardo Aromataris | 1 |
| Jennifer C. Stone | 1 |
| Larissa Shamseer | 1 |
| Miloslav Klugar | 1 |
| Rick Wiechula | 1 |
| Timothy Hugh Barker | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkDanielle Pollock; Timothy Hugh Barker; Jennifer C. Stone; Edoardo Aromataris; Miloslav Klugar; Anna M. Scott; Cindy Stern; Amanda Ross-White; Ashley Whitehorn; Rick Wiechula; Larissa Shamseer; Zachary Munn – Research Synthesis Methods, 2024
Predatory journals are a blemish on scholarly publishing and academia and the studies published within them are more likely to contain data that is false. The inclusion of studies from predatory journals in evidence syntheses is potentially problematic due to this propensity for false data to be included. To date, there has been little exploration…
Descriptors: Periodicals, Deception, Ethics, Medical Research
