NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 4 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Balfe, Catherine; Button, Patrick; Penn, Mary; Schwegman, David J. – Field Methods, 2023
Audit correspondence studies are field experiments that test for discriminatory behavior in active markets. Researchers measure discrimination by comparing how responsive individuals ("audited units") are to correspondences from different types of people. This article elaborates on the tradeoffs researchers face between sending audited…
Descriptors: Field Studies, Experiments, Audits (Verification), Researchers
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Byiers, Breanne J.; Pennington, Brittany; Rudolph, Brenna N.; Ford, Andrea L. B. – Journal of Behavioral Education, 2021
Single-case experimental designs (SCEDs) are a useful tool for evaluating the effects of interventions at an individual level and can play an important role in the development and validation of evidence-based practices. Historically, researchers relied on visual analysis of SCED data and eschewed statistical approaches. Although researchers…
Descriptors: Statistical Analysis, Research Design, Research Methodology, Experiments
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Odegard, Nina – Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 2021
This article draws on a new materialist paradigm to explore bricolaging data from an early childhood research project through an immanent ethical lens. This lens enables the researcher to stretch towards non-hierarchical relationships in between subjects and objects, thinking and doing. A bricoleur explores and builds different…
Descriptors: Data Collection, Early Childhood Education, Ethics, Educational Research
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Antonia Vaughan – International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 2025
Institutional ethics review procedures aim -- in principle -- to minimise harm and evaluate risks, providing an important space to consider the safety of participants and researchers. However, literature has questioned the effectiveness of the process, particularly for reviewing 'risky' topics in a risk-averse environment. This article reports the…
Descriptors: Evaluators, Experiments, Research Methodology, Ethics