Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 7 |
Descriptor
Bayesian Statistics | 7 |
Cheating | 7 |
Test Items | 5 |
Behavior Patterns | 4 |
Identification | 4 |
Reaction Time | 4 |
Item Response Theory | 3 |
Statistical Analysis | 3 |
Accuracy | 2 |
Achievement Gains | 2 |
Eye Movements | 2 |
More ▼ |
Author
Chun Wang | 2 |
Harring, Jeffrey R. | 2 |
Jing Lu | 2 |
Johnson, Matthew S. | 2 |
Man, Kaiwen | 2 |
Sinharay, Sandip | 2 |
Jiwei Zhang | 1 |
Ningzhong Shi | 1 |
Ross, Linette P. | 1 |
Xue Wang | 1 |
Publication Type
Reports - Research | 5 |
Journal Articles | 3 |
Dissertations/Theses -… | 1 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Elementary Education | 1 |
Grade 4 | 1 |
Higher Education | 1 |
Intermediate Grades | 1 |
Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
National Assessment of… | 1 |
Program for International… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Sinharay, Sandip; Johnson, Matthew S. – Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 2021
Score differencing is one of the six categories of statistical methods used to detect test fraud (Wollack & Schoenig, 2018) and involves the testing of the null hypothesis that the performance of an examinee is similar over two item sets versus the alternative hypothesis that the performance is better on one of the item sets. We suggest, to…
Descriptors: Probability, Bayesian Statistics, Cheating, Statistical Analysis
Sinharay, Sandip; Johnson, Matthew S. – Grantee Submission, 2021
Score differencing is one of six categories of statistical methods used to detect test fraud (Wollack & Schoenig, 2018) and involves the testing of the null hypothesis that the performance of an examinee is similar over two item sets versus the alternative hypothesis that the performance is better on one of the item sets. We suggest, to…
Descriptors: Probability, Bayesian Statistics, Cheating, Statistical Analysis
Man, Kaiwen; Harring, Jeffrey R. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2023
Preknowledge cheating jeopardizes the validity of inferences based on test results. Many methods have been developed to detect preknowledge cheating by jointly analyzing item responses and response times. Gaze fixations, an essential eye-tracker measure, can be utilized to help detect aberrant testing behavior with improved accuracy beyond using…
Descriptors: Cheating, Reaction Time, Test Items, Responses
Ross, Linette P. – ProQuest LLC, 2022
One of the most serious forms of cheating occurs when examinees have item preknowledge and prior access to secure test material before taking an exam for the purpose of obtaining an inflated test score. Examinees that cheat and have prior knowledge of test content before testing may have an unfair advantage over examinees that do not cheat. Item…
Descriptors: Testing, Deception, Cheating, Identification
Man, Kaiwen; Harring, Jeffrey R. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2021
Many approaches have been proposed to jointly analyze item responses and response times to understand behavioral differences between normally and aberrantly behaved test-takers. Biometric information, such as data from eye trackers, can be used to better identify these deviant testing behaviors in addition to more conventional data types. Given…
Descriptors: Cheating, Item Response Theory, Reaction Time, Eye Movements
A Sequential Bayesian Changepoint Detection Procedure for Aberrant Behaviors in Computerized Testing
Jing Lu; Chun Wang; Jiwei Zhang; Xue Wang – Grantee Submission, 2023
Changepoints are abrupt variations in a sequence of data in statistical inference. In educational and psychological assessments, it is pivotal to properly differentiate examinees' aberrant behaviors from solution behavior to ensure test reliability and validity. In this paper, we propose a sequential Bayesian changepoint detection algorithm to…
Descriptors: Bayesian Statistics, Behavior Patterns, Computer Assisted Testing, Accuracy
Jing Lu; Chun Wang; Ningzhong Shi – Grantee Submission, 2023
In high-stakes, large-scale, standardized tests with certain time limits, examinees are likely to engage in either one of the three types of behavior (e.g., van der Linden & Guo, 2008; Wang & Xu, 2015): solution behavior, rapid guessing behavior, and cheating behavior. Oftentimes examinees do not always solve all items due to various…
Descriptors: High Stakes Tests, Standardized Tests, Guessing (Tests), Cheating