Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Bibliometrics | 1 |
| Citations (References) | 1 |
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| Criteria | 1 |
| Databases | 1 |
| Information Retrieval | 1 |
| Publications | 1 |
| Search Engines | 1 |
| Search Strategies | 1 |
Source
| Research Synthesis Methods | 1 |
Author
| Dampier, Will | 1 |
| Klopfenstein, D. V. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Opinion Papers | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkKlopfenstein, D. V.; Dampier, Will – Research Synthesis Methods, 2021
We read with considerable interest the study by Gusenbauer and Haddaway (Gusenbauer and Haddaway, 2020, Research Synthesis Methods, doi:10.1002/jrsm.1378) comparing the systematic search qualities of 28 search systems, including Google Scholar (GS) and PubMed. Google Scholar and PubMed are the two most popular free academic search tools in biology…
Descriptors: Search Engines, Search Strategies, Databases, Information Retrieval
