NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 4 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Lenart-Gansiniec, Regina; Chen, Jin – Studies in Higher Education, 2023
Crowdfunding in research refers to raising funds by scientists for various research related tasks using crowdfunding platforms. In spite of growing academic interest, there is still a lack of understanding of the various aspects of the above concept. In particular, identification of antecedents, consequences, and limitations is important in…
Descriptors: Scientific Research, Financial Support, Group Activities, Fund Raising
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Bojko, Marta; Kowalczyk, Barbara – International Journal for Academic Development, 2023
In the highly competitive research sector, performance pressure is leading to the stratification of the academic profession, and to difficulties for early-career researchers. Support is therefore vital for talent retention, and to avoid 'brain drain'. However, limited research has distinguished varying models of professional support in research…
Descriptors: Mentors, Foreign Countries, Scientists, Scientific Research
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Rowland, Jussara; Estevens, João; Krzewinska, Aneta; Warwas, Izabela; Delicado, Ana – Science & Education, 2022
Public trust in science and expertise remains a contentious issue. When public trust is analysed, it often simplifies a complex process of information retrieval and interpretation. Questionnaire surveys help us make sense of differences among actors and countries, but they fail to provide a comprehensive analysis of the reasons that lead citizens…
Descriptors: Immunization Programs, Trust (Psychology), Cross Cultural Studies, Public Opinion
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Paruzel-Czachura, Mariola; Baran, Lidia; Spendel, Zbigniew – Research Ethics, 2021
The paper reports two studies exploring the relationship between scholars' self-reported publication pressure and their self-reported scientific misconduct in research. In Study 1 the participants (N = 423) were scholars representing various disciplines from one big university in Poland. In Study 2 the participants (N = 31) were exclusively…
Descriptors: Publish or Perish Issue, College Faculty, College Administration, Researchers