Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Accuracy | 2 |
Confidence Testing | 2 |
Memory | 2 |
Recognition (Psychology) | 2 |
College Students | 1 |
Cues | 1 |
Evaluative Thinking | 1 |
Evidence | 1 |
Foreign Countries | 1 |
Measurement Techniques | 1 |
Undergraduate Students | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
Journal of Experimental… | 2 |
Author
Dobbins, Ian G. | 1 |
Hanczakowski, Maciej | 1 |
Higham, Philip A. | 1 |
Jaeger, Antônio | 1 |
Queiroz, Morgana C. | 1 |
Selmeczy, Diana | 1 |
Zawadzka, Katarzyna | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 2 |
Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 2 |
Postsecondary Education | 2 |
Audience
Location
United Kingdom (Wales) | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Jaeger, Antônio; Queiroz, Morgana C.; Selmeczy, Diana; Dobbins, Ian G. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2020
During recognition memory decisions, external hints or cues alter the accuracy and confidence of correct rejections (valid > uncued > invalid). In contrast, although hits show analogous accuracy effects, hit confidence remains largely unaffected by cue validity. Prior research suggested this confidence validity dissociation (CVD) may depend…
Descriptors: Recognition (Psychology), Cues, Accuracy, Validity
Zawadzka, Katarzyna; Higham, Philip A.; Hanczakowski, Maciej – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2017
Two-alternative forced-choice recognition tests are commonly used to assess recognition accuracy that is uncontaminated by changes in bias. In such tests, participants are asked to endorse the studied item out of 2 presented alternatives. Participants may be further asked to provide confidence judgments for their recognition decisions. It is often…
Descriptors: Recognition (Psychology), Measurement Techniques, Confidence Testing, Memory