Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
College Students | 2 |
Cues | 2 |
Experimental Psychology | 2 |
Memory | 2 |
Prediction | 2 |
Visual Stimuli | 2 |
Behavior | 1 |
Classification | 1 |
Cognitive Processes | 1 |
Intention | 1 |
Models | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
Journal of Experimental… | 2 |
Author
McDaniel, Mark A. | 2 |
Anderson, Francis T. | 1 |
Bugg, Julie M. | 1 |
Cahill, Michael J. | 1 |
Rummel, Jan | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 2 |
Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 2 |
Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Missouri | 1 |
Missouri (Saint Louis) | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Anderson, Francis T.; Rummel, Jan; McDaniel, Mark A. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2018
In prospective memory (PM) research, costs (slowed responding to the ongoing task when a PM task is present relative to when it is not) have typically been interpreted as implicating an attentionally demanding monitoring process. To inform this interpretation, Heathcote, Loft, and Remington (2015), using an accumulator model, found that PM-related…
Descriptors: Memory, Responses, Behavior, Cues
McDaniel, Mark A.; Cahill, Michael J.; Bugg, Julie M. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2016
How does orthographic distinctiveness affect recall of structured (categorized) word lists? On one theory, enhanced item-specific information (e.g., more distinct encoding) in concert with robust relational information (e.g., categorical information) optimally supports free recall. This predicts that for categorically structured lists,…
Descriptors: Experimental Psychology, Recall (Psychology), Word Lists, Cognitive Processes