Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Source
| European Journal of… | 2 |
Author
| DeBoer, Jennifer | 2 |
| Atiq, S. Zahra | 1 |
| Berger, Edward | 1 |
| Cox, David | 1 |
| Evenhouse, David | 1 |
| Gerschutz, Maria | 1 |
| Haney, Casey | 1 |
| Patel, Nimit | 1 |
| Rhoads, Jeffrey F. | 1 |
| Smith, Casey | 1 |
| Stites, Nick A. | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
| Tests/Questionnaires | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 2 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Indiana | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
| Does not meet standards | 1 |
Peer reviewed
Direct linkDeBoer, Jennifer; Haney, Casey; Atiq, S. Zahra; Smith, Casey; Cox, David – European Journal of Engineering Education, 2019
A shortcoming of Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) is the lack of substantive integration of hands-on activities into online classrooms. We conducted a randomised control trial (RCT) in a MOOC where we sent the treatment group at-home lab kits with which they could perform experiments in their own homes. In our intervention research, we found…
Descriptors: Experimental Groups, Control Groups, Hands on Science, Electronic Learning
Evenhouse, David; Patel, Nimit; Gerschutz, Maria; Stites, Nick A.; Rhoads, Jeffrey F.; Berger, Edward; DeBoer, Jennifer – European Journal of Engineering Education, 2018
Engineering education has been slow to adopt research-based educational innovations. Few prior works on such adoption have investigated the combined classroom experiences of instructors and students when such innovations are being implemented. Therefore, this work focuses on the lived experiences of an instructor and her students when adopting an…
Descriptors: Educational Change, Undergraduate Students, Engineering Education, College Faculty
