Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Reading Fluency | 2 |
| Reading Rate | 2 |
| Text Structure | 2 |
| Audio Equipment | 1 |
| Computer Assisted Testing | 1 |
| Difficulty Level | 1 |
| Error Patterns | 1 |
| Lexicology | 1 |
| Oral Reading | 1 |
| Readability | 1 |
| Readability Formulas | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Grantee Submission | 2 |
Author
| Alonzo, Julie | 2 |
| Kamata, Akihito | 2 |
| Nese, Joseph F. T. | 2 |
| Biancarosa, Gina | 1 |
| Kahn, Joshua | 1 |
Publication Type
| Reports - Research | 2 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 2 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Flesch Kincaid Grade Level… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Download full textNese, Joseph F. T.; Alonzo, Julie; Biancarosa, Gina; Kamata, Akihito; Kahn, Joshua – Grantee Submission, 2017
Text complexity has received increased attention due to the CCSS, which call for students to comprehend increasingly more complex texts as they progress through grades. Quantitative text complexity (or readability) indices are based on text attributes (e.g., sentence lengths, and lexical, syntactic, & semantic difficulty), quantified by…
Descriptors: Reading Comprehension, Difficulty Level, Readability, Sentence Structure
Nese, Joseph F. T.; Alonzo, Julie; Kamata, Akihito – Grantee Submission, 2016
The purpose of this study was to compare traditional oral reading fluency (ORF) measures to a computerized oral reading evaluation (CORE) system that uses speech recognition software. We applied a mixed model approach with two within-subject variables to test the mean WCPM score differences and the error rates between: passage length (25, 50, 85,…
Descriptors: Text Structure, Oral Reading, Reading Fluency, Reading Tests
