Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Author
Almeroth, Kevin | 1 |
Bimber, Bruce | 1 |
Campbell, Julie | 1 |
Chun, Dorothy | 1 |
Ewing, Maureen | 1 |
Jagesic, Sanja | 1 |
Knight, Allan | 1 |
Mayer, Richard E. | 1 |
Moody, Joseph M. | 1 |
Smith, Kara | 1 |
Stull, Andrew T. | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Reports - Research | 2 |
Dissertations/Theses -… | 1 |
Journal Articles | 1 |
Education Level
High Schools | 2 |
Higher Education | 1 |
Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
Preliminary Scholastic… | 2 |
National Merit Scholarship… | 1 |
SAT (College Admission Test) | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Moody, Joseph M. – ProQuest LLC, 2023
Prior research suggested that all students were not treated equally in the educational setting and that boys perform better than girls on standardized tests. The purpose of this quantitative study was to examine how class composition affected performance on the math section of the Educational Records Bureau (ERB) test and Preliminary SAT (PSAT)…
Descriptors: Students, Females, Mathematics Achievement, Success
Smith, Kara; Jagesic, Sanja; Wyatt, Jeff; Ewing, Maureen – College Board, 2018
Projections by the President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (2012) point to a need for approximately one million more Science Technology Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) professionals than the U.S. will be able to produce considering the current rate of STEM postsecondary degree completions (Executive Office of the President of…
Descriptors: Advanced Placement Programs, STEM Education, Student Participation, High School Students
Mayer, Richard E.; Stull, Andrew T.; Campbell, Julie; Almeroth, Kevin; Bimber, Bruce; Chun, Dorothy; Knight, Allan – Educational Psychology Review, 2007
The authors analyzed self-reported SAT scores and actual SAT scores for five different samples of college students (N = 650). Students overestimated their actual SAT scores by an average of 25 points (SD = 81, d = 0.31), with 10% under-reporting, 51% reporting accurately, and 39% over-reporting, indicating a systematic bias towards over-reporting.…
Descriptors: Psychological Studies, Scoring, Measurement Techniques, College Students