Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Attitudes | 1 |
| Campuses | 1 |
| College Faculty | 1 |
| Court Litigation | 1 |
| Evaluation | 1 |
| Faculty Evaluation | 1 |
| Merit Pay | 1 |
| Productivity | 1 |
| Rewards | 1 |
| Teacher Promotion | 1 |
| Tenure | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Academe | 1 |
Author
| Elmore, H. W. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| United States | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkElmore, H. W. – Academe, 2008
The productivity of faculty members often figures prominently in annual evaluations, post-tenure reviews, and decisions about tenure, promotion, merit pay, release time, awards, and other kinds of recognition. Yet the procedures and instruments that institutions use to assess productivity and merit vary, leaving little that unifies the evaluation…
Descriptors: Merit Pay, Campuses, Tenure, Faculty Evaluation
