Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Audience Awareness | 2 |
| Advocacy | 1 |
| Civil Rights | 1 |
| Computer Assisted Design | 1 |
| Content Analysis | 1 |
| Context Effect | 1 |
| Evaluation Methods | 1 |
| Extension Education | 1 |
| Feedback (Response) | 1 |
| Judges | 1 |
| Literary Genres | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Barno, Trina Adler | 1 |
| Gold, Abby | 1 |
| Hurtado, G. Ali | 1 |
| Lovett, Kathleen | 1 |
| Propen, Amy D. | 1 |
| Schuster, Mary Lay | 1 |
| Sherman, Shelley | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
| Minnesota | 2 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkGold, Abby; Barno, Trina Adler; Sherman, Shelley; Lovett, Kathleen; Hurtado, G. Ali – Journal of Extension, 2013
Systematic evaluation is an essential tool for understanding program effectiveness. This article describes the pilot test of a statewide evaluation tool for the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program-Education (SNAP-Ed). A computer algorithm helped Community Nutrition Educators (CNEs) build surveys specific to their varied educational settings…
Descriptors: State Programs, Program Evaluation, Program Effectiveness, Evaluation Methods
Understanding Genre through the Lens of Advocacy: The Rhetorical Work of the Victim Impact Statement
Propen, Amy D.; Schuster, Mary Lay – Written Communication, 2010
Through interviews with judges and victim advocates, courtroom observations, and rhetorical analyses of victims' reactions to proposed sentences, the authors examine the features that judges and advocates think make victims' arguments persuasive. The authors conclude that this genre, recently imposed upon the court, functions as a mediating device…
Descriptors: Victims of Crime, Civil Rights, Context Effect, Writing (Composition)
