Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
| Foreign Countries | 3 |
| Reliability | 2 |
| Student Surveys | 2 |
| Academic Rank (Professional) | 1 |
| Benchmarking | 1 |
| College Programs | 1 |
| Course Evaluation | 1 |
| Departments | 1 |
| Differences | 1 |
| Factor Analysis | 1 |
| Gender Bias | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Marsh, Herbert W. | 3 |
| Cheng, Jacqueline H. S. | 2 |
| Behnia, Masud | 1 |
| Bond, Nigel W. | 1 |
| Ginns, Paul | 1 |
| Jayasinghe, Upali W. | 1 |
| Scalas, L. Francesca | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 3 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 2 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Australia | 2 |
| United Kingdom | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkGinns, Paul; Marsh, Herbert W.; Behnia, Masud; Cheng, Jacqueline H. S.; Scalas, L. Francesca – British Journal of Educational Psychology, 2009
Background: The introduction of the Australian Research Training Scheme has been a strong reason for assuring the quality of the research higher degree (RHD) experience; if students experience poor supervision, an unsupportive climate, and inadequate infrastructure, prior research suggests RHD students will be less likely to complete their degree,…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Student Attitudes, Graduate Students, Student Research
Cheng, Jacqueline H. S.; Marsh, Herbert W. – Oxford Review of Education, 2010
The National Student Survey (NSS) of course experience satisfaction is sent to final year students of all higher education institutions in England, Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales (N = 171,290 and 157,342 students in 2005 and 2006) and results are made publicly available. The present investigation assesses the reliability and appropriate use…
Descriptors: Higher Education, Student Surveys, Foreign Countries, National Surveys
Marsh, Herbert W.; Jayasinghe, Upali W.; Bond, Nigel W. – American Psychologist, 2008
Peer review is a gatekeeper, the final arbiter of what is valued in academia, but it has been criticized in relation to traditional psychological research criteria of reliability, validity, generalizability, and potential biases. Despite a considerable literature, there is surprisingly little sound peer-review research examining these criteria or…
Descriptors: Academic Rank (Professional), Psychological Studies, Validity, Social Sciences
