Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Assignments | 1 |
| Case Studies | 1 |
| Engineering Education | 1 |
| Evaluation Methods | 1 |
| Foreign Countries | 1 |
| Formative Evaluation | 1 |
| Grades (Scholastic) | 1 |
| Interviews | 1 |
| Peer Evaluation | 1 |
| Program Effectiveness | 1 |
| Student Motivation | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| European Journal of… | 1 |
Author
| Haugan, John | 1 |
| Lauvas, Per | 1 |
| Lysebo, Marius | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Norway | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkHaugan, John; Lysebo, Marius; Lauvas, Per – European Journal of Engineering Education, 2017
Formative assessment can serve as a catalyst for increased student effort and student learning. Yet, many engineering degree programmes are dominated by summative assessment and make limited use of formative assessment. The present case study serves as an example on how formative assessment can be used strategically to increase student effort and…
Descriptors: Formative Evaluation, Assignments, Engineering Education, Student Motivation
