NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 7 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Göran Lövestam; Susanne Bremer-Hoffmann; Koen Jonkers; Pieter van Nes – Research Ethics, 2025
The Joint Research Centre (JRC) is the European Commission's in-house science and knowledge service, employing a substantial staff of scientists devoted to conducting research to provide independent scientific advice for EU policy. Focussed on various research areas aligned with EU priorities, the JRC excels in delivering scientific evidence for…
Descriptors: Integrity, Ethics, Scientific Research, Scientists
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Boris Forthmann; Benjamin Goecke; Roger E. Beaty – Creativity Research Journal, 2025
Human ratings are ubiquitous in creativity research. Yet, the process of rating responses to creativity tasks -- typically several hundred or thousands of responses, per rater -- is often time-consuming and expensive. Planned missing data designs, where raters only rate a subset of the total number of responses, have been recently proposed as one…
Descriptors: Creativity, Research, Researchers, Research Methodology
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Winnie Lay; Loretta Gasparini; William Siero; Elizabeth K. Hughes – Research Ethics, 2025
Dynamic consent is increasingly recommended for longitudinal and biobanking research; however, the value of investing in such systems is unclear. We undertook a rapid review of the benefits and challenges of implementing dynamic consent by searching five databases (Ovid Medline, Ovid Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, Cumulative Index to Nursing and…
Descriptors: Databases, Research Reports, Researchers, Research Methodology
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Antonia Vaughan – International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 2025
Institutional ethics review procedures aim -- in principle -- to minimise harm and evaluate risks, providing an important space to consider the safety of participants and researchers. However, literature has questioned the effectiveness of the process, particularly for reviewing 'risky' topics in a risk-averse environment. This article reports the…
Descriptors: Evaluators, Experiments, Research Methodology, Ethics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Eric W. Schoon – Sociological Methods & Research, 2025
This article explores how researchers adapt to disruptions that cost them access to their field sites, advancing a uniquely sociological perspective on the dynamics of flexibility and adaptation in qualitative methods. Through interviews with 31 ethnographers whose access was preempted or eliminated, I find that adaptation varied systematically…
Descriptors: Field Studies, Researchers, Ethnography, Attitudes
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Lakshmana Rao Pinninti – PROFILE: Issues in Teachers' Professional Development, 2025
This article reports the impact of an exploratory action research (EAR) project on developing teachers' action research competencies. Through various face-to-face and online activities, the project facilitated four English language teachers to conduct EAR in their teaching contexts. Qualitative data were collected through reflective journals and…
Descriptors: Language Teachers, Action Research, Research Projects, English (Second Language)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Jo Ferrie; Sharon Greenwood – Teaching in Higher Education, 2025
Emotion is an integral part of the knowledge production process, yet is rarely acknowledged within research methods teaching or textbooks. As educators, preparing students for fieldwork is essential, and should go beyond skill-learning, towards building confidence in their ability to react both ethically and appropriately during fieldwork. This…
Descriptors: Qualitative Research, Field Studies, Research Methodology, Courses