Publication Date
| In 2025 | 2 |
Descriptor
| Longitudinal Studies | 2 |
| Researchers | 2 |
| Academic Language | 1 |
| Barriers | 1 |
| Costs | 1 |
| Databases | 1 |
| Distance Education | 1 |
| Doctoral Programs | 1 |
| Doctoral Students | 1 |
| Ethics | 1 |
| Feedback (Response) | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Information Analyses | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| United Kingdom | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkWinnie Lay; Loretta Gasparini; William Siero; Elizabeth K. Hughes – Research Ethics, 2025
Dynamic consent is increasingly recommended for longitudinal and biobanking research; however, the value of investing in such systems is unclear. We undertook a rapid review of the benefits and challenges of implementing dynamic consent by searching five databases (Ovid Medline, Ovid Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, Cumulative Index to Nursing and…
Descriptors: Databases, Research Reports, Researchers, Research Methodology
Jackie Tuck – Studies in Graduate and Postdoctoral Education, 2025
Purpose: This paper aims to show how an Academic Literacies lens can contribute to a deeper understanding of writing for a professional doctorate (PD) by focusing both on the language of supervisors' written feedback and on student and supervisor perspectives on feedback throughout Year 1 (Y1). Design/methodology/approach: Firstly, written…
Descriptors: Professional Education, Doctoral Programs, Doctoral Students, Writing Evaluation
