NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 9 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Roza Sagitova; Zarena Syrgak kyzy; Lynne Parmenter – Research Ethics, 2025
This paper addresses the issue of how local and global norms and requirements are negotiated in the early stages of development of Social Science research ethics policy in a Global South context. A review of relevant literature followed by analysis of relevant national and institutional policies highlights both tensions and creative potential for…
Descriptors: Developing Nations, Social Science Research, Local Norms, Global Approach
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Göran Lövestam; Susanne Bremer-Hoffmann; Koen Jonkers; Pieter van Nes – Research Ethics, 2025
The Joint Research Centre (JRC) is the European Commission's in-house science and knowledge service, employing a substantial staff of scientists devoted to conducting research to provide independent scientific advice for EU policy. Focussed on various research areas aligned with EU priorities, the JRC excels in delivering scientific evidence for…
Descriptors: Integrity, Ethics, Scientific Research, Scientists
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Winnie Lay; Loretta Gasparini; William Siero; Elizabeth K. Hughes – Research Ethics, 2025
Dynamic consent is increasingly recommended for longitudinal and biobanking research; however, the value of investing in such systems is unclear. We undertook a rapid review of the benefits and challenges of implementing dynamic consent by searching five databases (Ovid Medline, Ovid Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, Cumulative Index to Nursing and…
Descriptors: Databases, Research Reports, Researchers, Research Methodology
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Tejendra Pherali; Sara Bragg; Catherine Borra; Phil Jones – Research Ethics, 2025
The COVID-19 pandemic posed many ethical and practical challenges for academic research. Some of these have been documented, particularly in relation to health research, but less attention has been paid to the dilemmas encountered by educational and social science research. Given that pandemics are predicted to be more frequent, it is vital to…
Descriptors: COVID-19, Pandemics, Barriers, Ethics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Olivier Leclerc; Nicolas Klausser – Research Ethics, 2025
Reporting and investigating research misconduct can lead to disciplinary proceedings being initiated, and ultimately to disciplinary sanctions being imposed on convicted scientists. The conversion of research misconduct findings into disciplinary sanctions is poorly understood. This article analyses all the disciplinary decisions handed down on…
Descriptors: College Faculty, Graduate Students, Researchers, Ethics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Xinqu Zhang; Peng Wang – Research Ethics, 2025
Unethical research practices are prevalent in China, but little research has focused on the causes of these practices. Drawing on the criminology literature on organisational deviance, as well as the concept of "cengceng jiama," which illustrates the increase of pressure in the process of policy implementation within a top-down…
Descriptors: Research Problems, Ethics, Productivity, Universities
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
M. Obaidul Hamid; Barbara Hanna; Deanne Gannaway; Trang Thi Thuy Nguyen – International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 2025
This article provides a reflexive account of the authors' experiences of the ethical challenges in conducting a higher degree by research (HDR) supervision project prompted by the ethics review process in a major Australian university. The authors also raise epistemological questions about the specific focus of the study, given the interrelations…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Higher Education, Research Projects, Researchers
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Antonia Vaughan – International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 2025
Institutional ethics review procedures aim -- in principle -- to minimise harm and evaluate risks, providing an important space to consider the safety of participants and researchers. However, literature has questioned the effectiveness of the process, particularly for reviewing 'risky' topics in a risk-averse environment. This article reports the…
Descriptors: Evaluators, Experiments, Research Methodology, Ethics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Emma Brooks – Multilingua: Journal of Cross-Cultural and Interlanguage Communication, 2025
Researching in heterogeneous communities can present challenges for the most experienced of researchers, especially in the context of ethnographic work, where the dynamism and unpredictability of a research setting can make it difficult to anticipate the languages spoken. Drawing on data from multilingual health consultations, I reflect on…
Descriptors: Multilingualism, Ethnography, Second Language Learning, Health Services