NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 7 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Cathrine Moe; Lisbeth Uhrenfeldt; Ingjerd Gåre Kymre – Research Ethics, 2025
The increasing need for innovative research driven by rapid global changes gives doctoral supervisors of early-stage researchers a significant role in facilitating the ethical conduct of qualitative research. In the context of European Commission funding, the demands of research ethics and integrity place a tremendous responsibility on the…
Descriptors: Doctoral Students, Student Research, Ethics, Supervision
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Göran Lövestam; Susanne Bremer-Hoffmann; Koen Jonkers; Pieter van Nes – Research Ethics, 2025
The Joint Research Centre (JRC) is the European Commission's in-house science and knowledge service, employing a substantial staff of scientists devoted to conducting research to provide independent scientific advice for EU policy. Focussed on various research areas aligned with EU priorities, the JRC excels in delivering scientific evidence for…
Descriptors: Integrity, Ethics, Scientific Research, Scientists
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Winnie Lay; Loretta Gasparini; William Siero; Elizabeth K. Hughes – Research Ethics, 2025
Dynamic consent is increasingly recommended for longitudinal and biobanking research; however, the value of investing in such systems is unclear. We undertook a rapid review of the benefits and challenges of implementing dynamic consent by searching five databases (Ovid Medline, Ovid Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, Cumulative Index to Nursing and…
Descriptors: Databases, Research Reports, Researchers, Research Methodology
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Tejendra Pherali; Sara Bragg; Catherine Borra; Phil Jones – Research Ethics, 2025
The COVID-19 pandemic posed many ethical and practical challenges for academic research. Some of these have been documented, particularly in relation to health research, but less attention has been paid to the dilemmas encountered by educational and social science research. Given that pandemics are predicted to be more frequent, it is vital to…
Descriptors: COVID-19, Pandemics, Barriers, Ethics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Xinqu Zhang; Peng Wang – Research Ethics, 2025
Unethical research practices are prevalent in China, but little research has focused on the causes of these practices. Drawing on the criminology literature on organisational deviance, as well as the concept of "cengceng jiama," which illustrates the increase of pressure in the process of policy implementation within a top-down…
Descriptors: Research Problems, Ethics, Productivity, Universities
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Kelly Laas; Christine Z. Miller; Eric M. Brey; Elisabeth Hildt – Research Ethics, 2025
Student researchers encounter ethical issues daily, but little is known about their unique perspectives. This article presents the results of 30 qualitative semi-structured interviews exploring students' views and experiences around ethical issues in research groups. During the interviews, students were asked to describe challenges and successes…
Descriptors: Undergraduate Students, Graduate Students, Laboratory Procedures, Laboratory Training
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Roza Sagitova; Zarena Syrgak kyzy; Lynne Parmenter – Research Ethics, 2025
This paper addresses the issue of how local and global norms and requirements are negotiated in the early stages of development of Social Science research ethics policy in a Global South context. A review of relevant literature followed by analysis of relevant national and institutional policies highlights both tensions and creative potential for…
Descriptors: Developing Nations, Social Science Research, Local Norms, Global Approach