NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 4 results Save | Export
Ysseldyke, James E. – 1977
The author traces reasons to support his contention that the state of the art in assessing learning disabled students is not good. Among issues examined are the following: use of tests for purposes other than those for which they were intended; technical adequacy of currently used tests (standardization, reliability, validity); the use of deficit…
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Learning Disabilities, Student Evaluation, Test Bias
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Ysseldyke, James E.; And Others – Learning Disability Quarterly, 1981
The validity of the Woodcock-Johnson Psycho-Educational Battery was evaluated with a sample of 50 learning disabled fourth graders. In general, the Battery has some convergent validity but little discriminant validity relative to various cluster scores or specific uses. (Author)
Descriptors: Diagnostic Tests, Intermediate Grades, Learning Disabilities, Student Evaluation
Ysseldyke, James E.; And Others – 1979
Because a critical issue in current assessment efforts is the widespread use of technically inadequate tests, the study examined tests chosen by 159 school professionals during a computer simulation of placement decision making about potentially handicapped students. Chi square analysis showed technically adequate devices were chosen…
Descriptors: Decision Making, Disabilities, Elementary Secondary Education, Exceptional Child Research
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Ysseldyke, James E.; Marston, Douglas – School Psychology Review, 1982
When selecting standardized reading tests for purposes of decision making, the school psychologist must answer several questions, such as "What reading skills do I wish to assess?" or "How do I judge if the test is technically adequate?" Recommendations for test selection are made within the context of these questions.…
Descriptors: Criterion Referenced Tests, Elementary Education, Group Testing, Individual Testing