Descriptor
Author
Ysseldyke, James E. | 8 |
Algozzine, Bob | 3 |
Regan, Richard R. | 1 |
Thurlow, Martha L. | 1 |
Publication Type
Opinion Papers | 8 |
Information Analyses | 3 |
Journal Articles | 2 |
Collected Works - Serials | 1 |
Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Policymakers | 3 |
Practitioners | 2 |
Researchers | 1 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Education for All Handicapped… | 1 |
Goals 2000 | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
National Assessment of… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Ysseldyke, James E.; Algozzine, Bob – 1979
The paper considers problems in current assessment and evaluation practices with learning disabled students and discusses forces for change. Among the weaknesses noted are inadequate conceptual and definitional frameworks, practitioner bias, and technical inadequacies of currently used norm referenced tests. The authors outline three factors…
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods, Learning Disabilities, Student Evaluation
Ysseldyke, James E. – 1977
The author traces reasons to support his contention that the state of the art in assessing learning disabled students is not good. Among issues examined are the following: use of tests for purposes other than those for which they were intended; technical adequacy of currently used tests (standardization, reliability, validity); the use of deficit…
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Learning Disabilities, Student Evaluation, Test Bias

Ysseldyke, James E.; Algozzine, Bob – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1983
The authors suggest that the confusion and controversy over definitions of learning disabilities have been unproductive. They review findings on the assessment decision making process and emphasize the need for a new perspective on assessment and intervention. (CL)
Descriptors: Decision Making, Definitions, Educational Trends, Elementary Secondary Education
Thurlow, Martha L.; Ysseldyke, James E. – 1993
This paper cites evidence that the word "all" in referring to the education of all children is not being used in the universal sense, and notes that actions have not matched the rhetoric about "all" students. The paper defines the terms "outcomes,""indicators," and "standards." It discusses key issues that arise in talking about outcomes for all…
Descriptors: Academic Standards, Definitions, Disabilities, Educational Policy
Ysseldyke, James E.; Regan, Richard R. – 1979
The authors suggest that efforts to comply with the protection in evaluation procedures provisions of P.L. 94-142 (the Education for All Handicapped Children Act) have been characterized by attempts to identify a single fair test for use with specific groups of minority children, and that such efforts will not result in improved efforts to…
Descriptors: Compliance (Legal), Decision Making, Disabilities, Elementary Secondary Education

Algozzine, Bob; Ysseldyke, James E. – Learning Disability Quarterly, 1987
Most conceptualizations of learning disabilities are based on discrepancies between ability and achievement, but the dimensions of this parameter have not been documented. Discrepancies for 83 third graders, 48 fifth graders, and 50 twelfth graders were compared. The use of ability achievement discrepancies to determine the need for special…
Descriptors: Ability Identification, Achievement Rating, Elementary Secondary Education, Handicap Identification
Ysseldyke, James E.; And Others – 1994
This report is a summary of a March 1994 meeting to agree on guidelines for making inclusion and accommodation decisions concerning students with disabilities in national and state large-scale assessments. Much of the discussion at the meeting focused on the National Assessment of Educational Progress. Factors that lead to the exclusion of…
Descriptors: Academic Standards, Adaptive Testing, Decision Making, Disabilities
Ysseldyke, James E.; And Others – NCEO Policy Directions, 1994
By setting academic standards, America takes its first critical step toward providing a plan that will create an excellent educational system for the 21st century. It is important for those working on standards and those educating students with disabilities to work together as standards are being developed. Four kinds of standards need to be…
Descriptors: Academic Standards, Disabilities, Educational Change, Educational Legislation