Descriptor
Source
| Bulletin of Science,… | 1 |
| Journal of Chemical Education | 1 |
| School Science and Mathematics | 1 |
| Science Teacher | 1 |
Author
| Yager, Robert E. | 4 |
| Krajcik, Joseph S. | 1 |
| Lutz, Martha V. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 4 |
| Opinion Papers | 4 |
| Guides - Classroom - Teacher | 1 |
| Guides - Non-Classroom | 1 |
| Information Analyses | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
| Practitioners | 2 |
| Policymakers | 1 |
Location
| Iowa | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedYager, Robert E.; Lutz, Martha V. – School Science and Mathematics, 1995
Discusses problems with science education in schools in the context of their causes, including a dysfunctional working definition of science. Describes and illustrates the Science/Technology/Society movement as a potential means to correct these problems. Presents examples derived from statewide efforts in Iowa. (14 references) (Author/MKR)
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Misconceptions, Science and Society, Science Education
Peer reviewedYager, Robert E. – Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society, 1995
Discusses the importance of the teaching and learning of science/technology in the context of human experience. Highlights the role of constructivism in Science Technology Society (STS) reform efforts. (JRH)
Descriptors: Constructivism (Learning), Educational Change, Educational Strategies, Elementary Secondary Education
Peer reviewedKrajcik, Joseph S.; Yager, Robert E. – Journal of Chemical Education, 1987
Addresses the issue of whether traditional high school chemistry is needed for all students as preparation for the study of college level chemistry. Recommends an approach which stresses applications and societal issues for high school students. (ML)
Descriptors: Chemistry, College Science, Higher Education, Instructional Improvement
Peer reviewedYager, Robert E. – Science Teacher, 1990
The development of the Science/Society/Technology (STS) movement in the United States is reviewed. The basic philosophy of STS instruction is discussed. Traditional instruction is compared to STS instruction. Suggestions for making STS instruction more effective are provided. (CW)
Descriptors: Controversial Issues (Course Content), Critical Thinking, Educational Improvement, Educational Philosophy
