Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| Error of Measurement | 1 |
| Health Behavior | 1 |
| Health Education | 1 |
| Item Response Theory | 1 |
| Measurement | 1 |
| Measures (Individuals) | 1 |
| Models | 1 |
| Self Efficacy | 1 |
| Test Theory | 1 |
Source
| Health Education Research | 1 |
Author
| Allen, Diane D. | 1 |
| Li, Jun Corser | 1 |
| Wilson, Mark | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkWilson, Mark; Allen, Diane D.; Li, Jun Corser – Health Education Research, 2006
This paper compares the approach and resultant outcomes of item response models (IRMs) and classical test theory (CTT). First, it reviews basic ideas of CTT, and compares them to the ideas about using IRMs introduced in an earlier paper. It then applies a comparison scheme based on the AERA/APA/NCME "Standards for Educational and…
Descriptors: Health Education, Self Efficacy, Health Behavior, Measures (Individuals)
