Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 5 |
Descriptor
Experiments | 6 |
Conditioning | 5 |
Discrimination Learning | 4 |
Animals | 2 |
Classical Conditioning | 2 |
Evaluation Methods | 2 |
Fear | 2 |
Generalization | 2 |
Stimuli | 2 |
Task Analysis | 2 |
Visual Stimuli | 2 |
More ▼ |
Author
Vervliet, Bram | 7 |
Baeyens, Frank | 3 |
Hermans, Dirk | 3 |
Vansteenwegen, Debora | 3 |
Eelen, Paul | 2 |
Beckers, Tom | 1 |
Davis, Michael | 1 |
Duncan, Erica J. | 1 |
Effting, Marieke | 1 |
Iberico, Carlos | 1 |
Jovanovic, Tanja | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 7 |
Reports - Research | 6 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Vervliet, Bram; Iberico, Carlos; Vervoort, Ellen; Baeyens, Frank – Learning and Motivation, 2011
Generalization gradients have been investigated widely in animal conditioning experiments, but much less so in human predictive learning tasks. Here, we apply the experimental design of a recent study on conditioned fear generalization in humans (Lissek et al., 2008) to a predictive learning task, and examine the effects of a number of relevant…
Descriptors: Animals, Research Design, Testing, Conditioning
Effting, Marieke; Vervliet, Bram; Kindt, Merel – Learning and Motivation, 2010
Using a conditioned suppression task, two experiments examined retrospective revaluation effects after serial compound training in a release from overshadowing design. In Experiment 1, serial X [right arrow] A+ training produced suppression to target A, which was enhanced when preceded by feature X, whereas X by itself elicited no suppression.…
Descriptors: Experiments, Task Analysis, Evaluation Methods, Cues
Vervliet, Bram; Vansteenwegen, Deb; Hermans, Dirk – Learning and Motivation, 2010
Extinction is generally more fragile than conditioning, as illustrated by the contextual renewal effect. The traditional extinction procedure entails isolated presentations of the conditioned stimulus. Extinction may be boosted by adding isolated presentations of the unconditioned stimulus, as this should augment breaking the contingency between…
Descriptors: Conditioning, Learning Processes, Context Effect, Stimuli
Meulders, Ann; Vervliet, Bram; Vansteenwegen, Debora; Hermans, Dirk; Baeyens, Frank – Learning and Motivation, 2011
Unpredictability of an unconditioned stimulus (US) typically produces context conditioning in animals and humans. We modified the Martians task--a computer game measuring learning of Pavlovian associations through conditioned suppression--for assessing context conditioning in humans. One between-subjects and one within-subjects study are reported.…
Descriptors: Animals, Stimuli, Classical Conditioning, Games
Norrholm, Seth D.; Jovanovic, Tanja; Vervliet, Bram; Myers, Karyn M.; Davis, Michael; Rothbaum, Barbara O.; Duncan, Erica J. – Learning & Memory, 2006
The purpose of this study was to analyze fear extinction and reinstatement in humans using fear-potentiated startle. Participants were fear conditioned using a simple discrimination procedure with colored lights as the conditioned stimuli (CSs) and an airblast to the throat as the unconditioned stimulus (US). Participants were extinguished 24 h…
Descriptors: Fear, Conditioning, Responses, Visual Stimuli
Baeyens, Frank; Vervliet, Bram; Vansteenwegen, Debora; Beckers, Tom; Hermans, Dirk; Eelen, Paul – Learning and Motivation, 2004
Using a conditioned suppression task, we investigated simultaneous (XA-/A+) vs. sequential (X [right arrow] A-/A+) Feature Negative (FN) discrimination learning in humans. We expected the simultaneous discrimination to result in X (or alternatively the XA configuration) becoming an inhibitor acting directly on the US, and the sequential…
Descriptors: Classical Conditioning, Discrimination Learning, Experiments, Inhibition
Vervliet, Bram; Vansteenwegen, Debora; Eelen, Paul – Learning & Memory, 2004
In a human fear conditioning paradigm using the skin conductance response (SCR), participants were assigned to two groups. Following identical acquisition, group ABA (n = 16) was extinguished to a generalization stimulus (GS), whereas group AAB (n = 20) was extinguished to the conditioned stimulus (CS). At test, presenting the CS in group ABA…
Descriptors: Visual Stimuli, Conditioning, Fear, Generalization