Descriptor
Court Litigation | 4 |
Freedom of Speech | 4 |
Press Opinion | 4 |
Censorship | 3 |
Journalism | 3 |
News Media | 3 |
Constitutional Law | 2 |
School Newspapers | 2 |
Secondary Education | 2 |
Student Rights | 2 |
Student School Relationship | 2 |
More ▼ |
Source
Author
Trager, Robert | 4 |
Chamberlin, Bill F. | 1 |
Dickerson, Donna L. | 1 |
Plopper, Bruce Loren | 1 |
Publication Type
Speeches/Meeting Papers | 4 |
Information Analyses | 1 |
Opinion Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Trager, Robert; Chamberlin, Bill F. – 1987
Since the 1974 Supreme Court dicta in "Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.," many courts have held that statement of opinion is constitutionally protected. However, statements that appear to be opinion based on undisclosed facts or knowledge not generally known to the public can be an exception. For instance, courts have protected specific…
Descriptors: Constitutional Law, Court Litigation, Freedom of Speech, Higher Education
Trager, Robert – 1987
The press and public should have access to pretrial discovery documents in civil litigation when matters of public concern are at issue. Recently, the Supreme Court expanded the public's First Amendment right of access to criminal proceedings, and based on that, some lower courts have granted access to civil trials. In its decisions establishing…
Descriptors: Censorship, Civil Liberties, Constitutional Law, Court Litigation
Trager, Robert; Plopper, Bruce Loren – 1978
Since 1939, legal recognition of the public forum concept has been gradually extended to include the public schools. This expansion of the free speech right has been accompanied by a movement of similar intensity aimed at narrowing the scope of regulatory action that might inhibit First Amendment freedoms. Ultimately, recognition of the public…
Descriptors: Academic Freedom, Censorship, Court Litigation, Freedom of Speech
Trager, Robert; Dickerson, Donna L. – 1977
After a unique court decision forbidding prior restraint in public high school publications in three states, a study was devised based on the responses to individual questionnaires sent to principals, faculty advisers, and student editors in each of the schools in the judicial district involved in the decision. Respondents answered questions…
Descriptors: Censorship, Court Litigation, Faculty Advisers, Federal Courts