Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 4 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 5 |
Descriptor
| Disabilities | 8 |
| Elementary School Students | 8 |
| Correlation | 6 |
| Reading Achievement | 6 |
| Mathematics Achievement | 5 |
| Accountability | 4 |
| Cohort Analysis | 4 |
| Comparative Analysis | 4 |
| Computation | 4 |
| Growth Models | 4 |
| Language Arts | 4 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Tindal, Gerald | 8 |
| Elliott, Stephen N. | 5 |
| Yel, Nedim | 5 |
| Nese, Joseph F. T. | 4 |
| Schulte, Ann C. | 4 |
| Stevens, Joseph J. | 4 |
| Alonzo, Julie | 3 |
| Anderson, Daniel | 3 |
| Matta, Tyler | 2 |
| Ketterlin-Geller, Leanne | 1 |
| Kurz, Alexander | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Reports - Research | 6 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
| Numerical/Quantitative Data | 1 |
Education Level
| Elementary Education | 8 |
| Grade 1 | 1 |
| Grade 3 | 1 |
| Grade 4 | 1 |
| Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Arizona | 2 |
| Oregon | 2 |
| North Carolina | 1 |
| Pennsylvania | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
| No Child Left Behind Act 2001 | 2 |
Assessments and Surveys
| North Carolina End of Course… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Download full textSchulte, Ann C.; Stevens, Joseph J.; Nese, Joseph F. T.; Yel, Nedim; Tindal, Gerald; Elliott, Stephen N. – National Center on Assessment and Accountability for Special Education, 2018
This technical report is one of a series of four technical reports that describe the results of a study comparing eight alternative models for estimating school academic achievement using data from the Arizona, North Carolina, Oregon, and Pennsylvania accountability systems. The purpose of these reports was to evaluate a broad range of models…
Descriptors: School Effectiveness, Models, Computation, Comparative Analysis
Nese, Joseph F. T.; Stevens, Joseph J.; Schulte, Ann C.; Tindal, Gerald; Yel, Nedim; Anderson, Daniel; Matta, Tyler; Elliott, Stephen N. – National Center on Assessment and Accountability for Special Education, 2018
This technical report is one of a series of four technical reports that describe the results of a study comparing eight alternative models for estimating school academic achievement using data from the Arizona, North Carolina, Oregon, and Pennsylvania accountability systems. The purpose of these reports was to evaluate a broad range of models…
Descriptors: School Effectiveness, Models, Computation, Comparative Analysis
Stevens, Joseph J.; Nese, Joseph F. T.; Schulte, Ann C.; Tindal, Gerald; Yel, Nedim; Anderson, Daniel; Matta, Tyler; Elliott, Stephen N. – National Center on Assessment and Accountability for Special Education, 2017
This technical report is one of a series of four technical reports that describe the results of a study comparing eight alternative models for estimating school academic achievement using data from the Arizona, North Carolina, Oregon, and Pennsylvania accountability systems. The purpose of these reports was to evaluate a broad range of models…
Descriptors: School Effectiveness, Models, Computation, Comparative Analysis
Schulte, Ann C.; Nese, Joseph F. T.; Stevens, Joseph J.; Yel, Nedim; Tindal, Gerald; Anderson, Daniel; Elliott, Stephen N. – National Center on Assessment and Accountability for Special Education, 2017
This technical report is one of a series of four technical reports that describe the results of a study comparing eight alternative models for estimating school academic achievement using data from the Arizona, North Carolina, Oregon, and Pennsylvania accountability systems. The purpose of these reports was to evaluate a broad range of models…
Descriptors: School Effectiveness, Models, Computation, Comparative Analysis
Elliott, Stephen N.; Kurz, Alexander; Tindal, Gerald; Stevens, Joseph; Yel, Nedim – National Center on Assessment and Accountability for Special Education, 2014
We examined the relationship among key instructional process variables and the achievement of students with and without disabilities as measured by both interim and end-of-year summative assessments. Examination of the instructional process data indicated that students with and without disabilities receiving mathematics instruction in the same…
Descriptors: Mathematics Achievement, Achievement Gap, Elementary School Students, Secondary School Students
Ketterlin-Geller, Leanne; Alonzo, Julie; Tindal, Gerald – Behavioral Research and Teaching, 2004
Focus groups were used to examine the needs of students taking a computer adaptive math assessment. The assessment designed using universal design and item response theory. Focus groups included teachers, administrators, child advocacy groups, and 3rd grade students and parents from the following groups: students with disabilities, students in…
Descriptors: Focus Groups, Access to Computers, Disabilities, Child Advocacy
Alonzo, Julie; Tindal, Gerald – Behavioral Research and Teaching, 2004
The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 has increased the role of assessment in K-12 education. Designed to ensure that all students meet high academic standards, the law currently requires states receiving Title I funds to test all children annually in reading and math in grades 3 through 8 and report student performance disaggregated by poverty,…
Descriptors: Reading Comprehension, Reading Fluency, Reading Achievement, Grade 4
Alonzo, Julie; Tindal, Gerald – Behavioral Research and Teaching, 2004
This technical report provides data on the extent to which progress monitoring measures explain reading achievement. The four progress monitoring measures discussed are: letter sounding, phonemic segmentation, oral reading fluency, and comprehension given in either oral or written form. These measures were administered to first grade students in…
Descriptors: Reading Comprehension, Listening Comprehension, Reading Fluency, Phonemics
