Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 6 |
Descriptor
Grade 6 | 6 |
Grade 7 | 5 |
Grade 8 | 4 |
Grade 3 | 3 |
Grade 4 | 3 |
Grade 5 | 3 |
Accountability | 2 |
Achievement Gains | 2 |
Achievement Gap | 2 |
Achievement Tests | 2 |
Alternative Assessment | 2 |
More ▼ |
Source
Journal of Special Education | 2 |
Applied Measurement in… | 1 |
Educational Assessment | 1 |
Journal of Educational… | 1 |
Remedial and Special Education | 1 |
Author
Tindal, Gerald | 6 |
Nese, Joseph F. T. | 4 |
Elliott, Stephen N. | 3 |
Stevens, Joseph J. | 3 |
Anderson, Daniel | 2 |
Schulte, Ann C. | 2 |
Farley, Dan | 1 |
Kahn, Joshua D. | 1 |
Kurz, Alexander | 1 |
Saven, Jessica L. | 1 |
Yel, Nedim | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 6 |
Reports - Research | 6 |
Education Level
Elementary Education | 6 |
Grade 6 | 6 |
Intermediate Grades | 6 |
Junior High Schools | 6 |
Middle Schools | 6 |
Secondary Education | 6 |
Grade 7 | 5 |
Grade 8 | 4 |
Early Childhood Education | 3 |
Grade 3 | 3 |
Grade 4 | 3 |
More ▼ |
Audience
Location
Oregon | 3 |
Arizona | 1 |
North Carolina | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
North Carolina End of Course… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Anderson, Daniel; Kahn, Joshua D.; Tindal, Gerald – Applied Measurement in Education, 2017
Unidimensionality and local independence are two common assumptions of item response theory. The former implies that all items measure a common latent trait, while the latter implies that responses are independent, conditional on respondents' location on the latent trait. Yet, few tests are truly unidimensional. Unmodeled dimensions may result in…
Descriptors: Robustness (Statistics), Item Response Theory, Mathematics Tests, Grade 6
Tindal, Gerald; Nese, Joseph F. T.; Stevens, Joseph J. – Educational Assessment, 2017
For the past decade, the accountability model associated with No Child Left Behind (NCLB) emphasized proficiency on end of year tests; with Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) the emphasis on proficiency within statewide testing programs, though now integrated with other measures of student learning, nevertheless remains a primary metric for…
Descriptors: Testing Programs, Middle School Students, Models, State Standards
Schulte, Ann C.; Stevens, Joseph J.; Elliott, Stephen N.; Tindal, Gerald; Nese, Joseph F. T. – Journal of Educational Psychology, 2016
Reading comprehension growth trajectories from 3rd to 7th grade were estimated for 99,919 students on a state reading comprehension assessment. We examined whether differences between students in general education (GE) and groups of students identified as exceptional learners were best characterized as stable, widening, or narrowing. The groups…
Descriptors: Reading Comprehension, Achievement Gap, Disabilities, Reading Tests
Nese, Joseph F. T.; Stevens, Joseph J.; Schulte, Ann C.; Tindal, Gerald; Elliott, Stephen N. – Journal of Special Education, 2017
Our purpose was to examine different approaches to modeling the time-varying nature of exceptionality classification. Using longitudinal data from one state's mathematics achievement test for 28,829 students in Grades 3 to 8, we describe the reclassification rate within special education and between general and special education, and compare four…
Descriptors: Classification, Achievement Gains, Special Needs Students, Mathematics Achievement
Elliott, Stephen N.; Kurz, Alexander; Tindal, Gerald; Yel, Nedim – Remedial and Special Education, 2017
We examined instructional processes in classrooms where students with and without disabilities received mathematics instruction to understand the relationship among key instructional process variables and achievement as measured by interim and end-of-year summative assessments. Teachers (N = 78) completed instructional logs daily and administered…
Descriptors: Mathematics Instruction, Mathematics Achievement, Summative Evaluation, Special Education
Saven, Jessica L.; Anderson, Daniel; Nese, Joseph F. T.; Farley, Dan; Tindal, Gerald – Journal of Special Education, 2016
Students with significant cognitive disabilities are eligible to participate in two statewide testing options for accountability: alternate assessments or general assessments with appropriate accommodations. Participation guidelines are generally quite vague, leading to students "switching" test participation between years. In this…
Descriptors: Intellectual Disability, Student Participation, State Surveys, Alternative Assessment