NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Publication Date
In 20250
Since 20240
Since 2021 (last 5 years)0
Since 2016 (last 10 years)0
Since 2006 (last 20 years)3
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Elementary and Secondary…2
Assessments and Surveys
National Assessment of…1
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 16 to 30 of 55 results Save | Export
Stufflebeam, Daniel L. – 1991
Evaluation of personnel is an essential means of ensuring quality in education. However, evaluations of teachers and administrators have often been divisive and counterproductive. This book is the product of a collaborative effort by 14 professional associations as a guide for assessing or developing systems for evaluating education personnel at…
Descriptors: Administrator Evaluation, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Criteria, Higher Education
Guba, Egon G.; Stufflebeam, Daniel L. – 1970
Part 1 of this monograph discusses the status of educational evaluation and describes several problems in carrying out such evaluation: (1) defining the educational setting, (2) defining decision types, (3) designing educational evaluation, (4) designing evaluation systems, and (5) defining criteria for judging evaluation. Part 2 proposes an…
Descriptors: Data Collection, Decision Making, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Stufflebeam, Daniel L.; Wingate, Lori A. – American Journal of Evaluation, 2005
This article describes the Self-Assessment of Program Evaluation Expertise instrument and procedure developed to help participants assess their learning gains in a 3-week evaluation institute. Participants completed the instrument in a pre- and posttest format. To reduce both the threat of embarrassment from individual results and the temptation…
Descriptors: Program Evaluation, Self Evaluation (Individuals), Evaluation Research, Test Validity
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Stufflebeam, Daniel L. – Community Education Journal, 1975
Emphasizes the need for improved evaluation of community education efforts. Outlines a conceptual framework for program evaluation and offers an operational definition of evaluation to serve as a guide for organizing and conducting evaluation of community education programs. (JG)
Descriptors: Community Education, Conceptual Schemes, Definitions, Educational Assessment
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Nevo, David; Stufflebeam, Daniel L. – Studies in Educational Evaluation, 1976
High school students, teachers, and principals were surveyed regarding their perceptions of the availability and importance of different types of evaluative information. Overall, all three groups perceived that evaluative information was only occasionally available, which indicating that such information was important. (Author/MV)
Descriptors: Evaluation Needs, Formative Evaluation, High School Students, High Schools
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Stufflebeam, Daniel L. – New Directions for Evaluation, 2001
This monograph identifies, analyzes, and judges 22 evaluation approaches used in program evaluation. Two approaches, labeled psuedoevaluations, are politically oriented and often used to misrepresent a program's value. The remaining 20, judged legitimate, are categorized by their orientations, and rated for their value. (SLD)
Descriptors: Classification, Evaluation Methods, Models, Political Influences
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Stufflebeam, Daniel L. – Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 1998
The concerns postmodernists have about evaluations, especially in education, are explored. Postmodernist and standards-based perspectives on evaluation are described, and specific questions about the role of postmodernism in evaluation are addressed from a standards-based perspective. (SLD)
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Performance Based Assessment, Postmodernism, Standards
Stufflebeam, Daniel L. – 1970
Experimental design has only limited utility inthe field of educational evaluation and, in general, the methodology of the former does not equal the methodology of the latter; in fact, experimental design plays a limited role in the total framework of educational evaluation. Experimental design does have potential utility in the areas of input and…
Descriptors: Educational Experiments, Educational Research, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods
Stufflebeam, Daniel L. – 1971
An evaluative symposium conducted during the 1971 Annual Meeting of the AERA offered the following critiques on "Educational Evaluation and Decision Making," a book prepared by the Phi Delta Kappa Study Committee on Evaluation: "A Critique of the Report of the Phi Delta Kappa Study Committee on Evaluation" (Henry M. Brickell); "A Critique of the…
Descriptors: Accountability, Book Reviews, Conferences, Decision Making
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Stufflebeam, Daniel L. – Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 1995
Eight reasons are proposed to support the argument that it should be possible to move toward a consensus about educational evaluation. The eight standards of the American Association of School Administrators are explored as starting points for developing a sound evaluation system and procedures. (SLD)
Descriptors: Administrator Evaluation, Educational Administration, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Stufflebeam, Daniel L.; Welch, Wayne L. – Educational Administration Quarterly, 1986
Reviews empirical studies that have been conducted on program evaluation in large United States school districts. Provides information for use in assessing and improving evaluation studies and systems at the precollege level and in providing direction for further research. Sixty-seven footnotes are appended. (IW)
Descriptors: Audience Analysis, Educational Assessment, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Stufflebeam, Daniel L. – Journal of Research and Development in Education, 1971
Analysis supports the theory that the CIPP Evaluation Model provides both proactive support for decision making and retroactive support for accountability. (Author)
Descriptors: Accountability, Comparative Analysis, Decision Making, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Stufflebeam, Daniel L. – American Journal of Evaluation, 2004
The past few years have seen efforts in several countries and a wide range of disciplines to adopt and apply existing professional standards for guiding and judging evaluation services and/or develop new standards. Some of the efforts have drawn from the work and products of the North American Joint Committee on Standards for Educational…
Descriptors: National Standards, Evaluation Methods, Quality Control, Program Evaluation
Nevo, David; Stufflebeam, Daniel L. – 1975
The main purposes of this study were to identify the evaluation needs of students, teachers, and principals, and to develop recommendations for an evaluation system within the school building. Students, teachers, and principals were surveyed to depict the availability and importance of eight different categories of evaluative information derived…
Descriptors: Evaluation Needs, Formative Evaluation, High Schools, Information Needs
Stufflebeam, Daniel L.; Sanders, James R. – 1986
A review of the literature reveals that although effective personnel evaluation is critical to the improvement of educational institutions, productive evaluation policies and procedures are rarely used currently. The low quality of many of the procedures now used is a major reason why efforts to base employment and salary decisions on evaluations…
Descriptors: Accountability, Elementary Secondary Education, Personnel Evaluation, School Personnel
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4