NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 8 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Soh, Kaycheng – Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 2017
World university rankings use the weight-and-sum approach to process data. Although this seems to pass the common sense test, it has statistical problems. In recent years, seven such problems have been uncovered: spurious precision, weight discrepancies, assumed mutual compensation, indictor redundancy, inter-system discrepancy, negligence of…
Descriptors: Reputation, Colleges, Evaluation Methods, Institutional Characteristics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Soh, Kaycheng – Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 2016
Many universities strive to become world-class and two of Singapore's universities are almost there, being ranked 12th and 13th in the QSWUR 2015/16. This study looked into the details of indicator rankings and found that the two universities are comparable to those in the top 10 universities in the same ranking in practically all indicators with…
Descriptors: Reputation, Universities, Foreign Countries, Citations (References)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Soh, Kaycheng – Studies in Higher Education, 2014
Universitas 21 Ranking of National Higher Education Systems (U21 Ranking) is one of the three new ranking systems appearing in 2012. In contrast with the other systems, U21 Ranking uses countries as the unit of analysis. It has several features which lend it with greater trustworthiness, but it also shared some methodological issues with the other…
Descriptors: Colleges, Rating Scales, Reputation, Weighted Scores
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Soh, Kaycheng – Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 2013
Recent research into university ranking methodologies uncovered several methodological problems among the systems currently in vogue. One of these is the discrepancy between the nominal and attained weights. The problem is the summation of unstandardized indicators for the total scores used in ranking. It is demonstrated that weight discrepancy…
Descriptors: Reputation, Institutional Evaluation, Educational Quality, Scores
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Soh, Kaycheng – Quality in Higher Education, 2013
"Times Higher Education" 100 under 50 ranking is a new twist to the university ranking. It focuses on universities that have a history of 50 years or less with the purpose of offsetting the advantage of prestige of the older ones. This article re-analysed the data publicly available and looked into relevant conceptual and statistical issues. The…
Descriptors: Higher Education, Reputation, Colleges, Universities
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Soh, Kaycheng – Higher Education Review, 2014
World university rankings (WUR) use the weight-and-sum approach to arrive at an overall measure which is then used to rank the participating universities of the world. Although the weight-and-sum procedure seems straightforward and accords with common sense, it has hidden methodological or statistical problems which render the meaning of the…
Descriptors: Reputation, Correlation, Institutional Evaluation, Statistical Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Soh, Kaycheng – Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 2013
Discrepancies between the nominal and attained indicator weights misinform rank consumers as to the relative importance of the indicators. This may lead to unwarranted institutional judgements and misdirected actions, causing resources being wasted unnecessarily. As a follow-up to two earlier studies, data from the Academic Ranking of World…
Descriptors: Reputation, Universities, Scores, Standards
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Soh, Kaycheng – New Horizons in Education, 2012
Background: World university rankings have been around for a decade and there are several such systems competing for the attention of higher education institutions. A frequent criticism is that they have a bias toward English-speaking countries and sciences; Europe and the Latin America have been vocal about this and are working on alternatives.…
Descriptors: Factor Analysis, Higher Education, Foreign Countries, Reputation