NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Publication Date
In 20250
Since 20240
Since 2021 (last 5 years)0
Since 2016 (last 10 years)4
Since 2006 (last 20 years)4
Author
Sinharay, Sandip4
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing all 4 results Save | Export
Sinharay, Sandip – Grantee Submission, 2019
Benefiting from item preknowledge (e.g., McLeod, Lewis, & Thissen, 2003) is a major type of fraudulent behavior during educational assessments. This paper suggests a new statistic that can be used for detecting the examinees who may have benefitted from item preknowledge using their response times. The statistic quantifies the difference in…
Descriptors: Test Items, Cheating, Reaction Time, Identification
Sinharay, Sandip – Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 2018
Wollack, Cohen, and Eckerly suggested the "erasure detection index" (EDI) to detect fraudulent erasures for individual examinees. Wollack and Eckerly extended the EDI to detect fraudulent erasures at the group level. The EDI at the group level was found to be slightly conservative. This article suggests two modifications of the EDI for…
Descriptors: Deception, Identification, Testing Problems, Cheating
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Sinharay, Sandip – Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 2017
An increasing concern of producers of educational assessments is fraudulent behavior during the assessment (van der Linden, 2009). Benefiting from item preknowledge (e.g., Eckerly, 2017; McLeod, Lewis, & Thissen, 2003) is one type of fraudulent behavior. This article suggests two new test statistics for detecting individuals who may have…
Descriptors: Test Items, Cheating, Testing Problems, Identification
Sinharay, Sandip – Grantee Submission, 2017
Wollack, Cohen, and Eckerly (2015) suggested the "erasure detection index" (EDI) to detect fraudulent erasures for individual examinees. Wollack and Eckerly (2017) extended the EDI to detect fraudulent erasures at the group level. The EDI at the group level was found to be slightly conservative. This paper suggests two modifications of…
Descriptors: Deception, Identification, Testing Problems, Cheating