Descriptor
Court Litigation | 8 |
Search and Seizure | 8 |
Student Rights | 8 |
Elementary Secondary Education | 7 |
Due Process | 5 |
School Law | 4 |
Student School Relationship | 4 |
Illegal Drug Use | 3 |
Civil Rights | 2 |
Constitutional Law | 2 |
Crime | 2 |
More ▼ |
Author
Sendor, Benjamin | 8 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 8 |
Legal/Legislative/Regulatory… | 4 |
Guides - Non-Classroom | 3 |
Opinion Papers | 3 |
Information Analyses | 1 |
Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Policymakers | 2 |
Administrators | 1 |
Practitioners | 1 |
Location
New Jersey | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Fourth Amendment | 3 |
New Jersey v TLO | 2 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Sendor, Benjamin – American School Board Journal, 1985
A Supreme Court ruling of January 1985 reversed a New Jersey Supreme Court decision of March 1984, which found a student search violated the Fourth Amendment. The reversal by the Supreme Court leaves unanswered some important questions about school searches. (MD)
Descriptors: Court Litigation, Search and Seizure, Secondary Education, Student Rights
Sendor, Benjamin – American School Board Journal, 1996
When school employees investigate alleged misconduct by students, they must follow school rules and federal and state laws. A school-locker search in a recent case from Indiana--"S.A. versus State"--illustrates the importance of employees and students knowing the rules governing investigations, and of specific employees being given the…
Descriptors: Court Litigation, Elementary Secondary Education, Public Schools, School Law
Sendor, Benjamin – American School Board Journal, 1986
Reviews a recent case involving searches of student lockers from the Washington State Court of Appeals. According to this decision the Supreme Court's two criteria of reasonableness in student searches ("New Jersey v. T.L.O.") also apply to student lockers and may apply to searches of student desks, cars, and clothing. (MD)
Descriptors: Court Litigation, Due Process, Elementary Secondary Education, Illegal Drug Use
Sendor, Benjamin – American School Board Journal, 1986
In the "New Jersey vs. T.L.O." decision the Supreme Court clarified the law concerning student searches. Reviews two recent California cases illustrating how courts are interpreting the Supreme Court decision in a way that upholds reasonable student searches. (MD)
Descriptors: Civil Rights, Constitutional Law, Court Litigation, Crime
Sendor, Benjamin – American School Board Journal, 1983
Discusses the Fifth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals' rewriting of its earlier decision in "Horton v. Goose Creek Independent School District" of Baytown (Texas), involving the use of dogs in school drug and liquor searches. Compares the decision with other circuits' conflicting rulings and suggests guidelines for using dogs. (RW)
Descriptors: Alcoholic Beverages, Civil Rights, Court Litigation, Due Process
Sendor, Benjamin – American School Board Journal, 1987
Reviews the Supreme Court student search policy in relation to a recent decision concerning a Pima County, Arizona, high school student search that revealed cocaine but was found to be an illegal search. Also reviews the lower court decision in "Loudermill v. Cleveland Board of Education," which found that the school had provided its…
Descriptors: Court Litigation, Crime, Dismissal (Personnel), Due Process
Sendor, Benjamin – American School Board Journal, 1984
A current United States Supreme Court case will determine constitutional guidelines for school administrators in searching students for drugs and other school contraband. Thus far, the New Jersey Supreme Court has established a demanding standard for warrantless searches of students and their property, requiring respect for students'"valid…
Descriptors: Constitutional Law, Court Litigation, Discipline Policy, Elementary Secondary Education
Sendor, Benjamin – American School Board Journal, 1985
Reviews four recent cases decided in state and federal courts. The cases focused on due process in student suspensions, the use of unlawfully obtained evidence in disciplinary hearings, unacceptable methods for handling personnel conflicts, and the application of voluntary affirmative action policies during periods of staff reduction. (PGD)
Descriptors: Affirmative Action, Court Litigation, Dismissal (Personnel), Due Process