Descriptor
Occupational Tests | 5 |
Test Validity | 4 |
Equal Opportunities (Jobs) | 2 |
Generalization | 2 |
Personnel Selection | 2 |
Test Bias | 2 |
Testing Problems | 2 |
Access to Education | 1 |
Adaptive Testing | 1 |
Adults | 1 |
Aptitude Tests | 1 |
More ▼ |
Author
Schmidt, Frank L. | 5 |
Hunter, John E. | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 3 |
Opinion Papers | 1 |
Reference Materials -… | 1 |
Reports - Research | 1 |
Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Researchers | 1 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating

Schmidt, Frank L.; Hunter, John E. – Personnel Psychology, 1984
Empirically tests the prediction of the situational specificity hypothesis of personnel selection that states that if the situation is held constant, then validity findings will not vary. Results showed that variation in observed validities is due to statistical and measurement artifacts that are unrelated to situations and settings. (LLL)
Descriptors: Generalization, Occupational Tests, Personnel Selection, Test Validity
Schmidt, Frank L. – 1985
This paper describes how work by the United States Office of Personnel Management on the generalizability of employment test validities led to the development of a widely applicable meta-analysis method. The method focuses strongly on estimating the true variance of study correlations and effect size. This validity generalization procedure has…
Descriptors: Effect Size, Error of Measurement, Estimation (Mathematics), Generalizability Theory

Schmidt, Frank L.; And Others – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1978
Computer assisted tailored testing was used in a study of 163 Civil Service examinees to assess examinee's affective response to the testing setting. Response was summarized as overwhelmingly positive. (Author/JKS)
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Adults, Attitudes, Computer Assisted Testing

Schmidt, Frank L.; And Others – Personnel Psychology, 1980
Results for employment tests indicated that differential validity occurs no more frequently than would be expected on the basis of chance plus the operation of various statistical artifacts. Similar results were obtained on educational tests. Tests are neither differentially valid for, nor unfair to, Hispanics. (Author)
Descriptors: Access to Education, Educational Testing, Equal Opportunities (Jobs), Hispanic Americans

Schmidt, Frank L. – Journal of Vocational Behavior, 1988
Draws from validity generalization research to summarize evidence disputing theories that objective employment tests are either biased against minorities or lack utility. Argues that group differences in test scores do not result from deficiencies in tests, but in skills they measure. Suggests that measurement-based research does not provide…
Descriptors: Aptitude Tests, Equal Opportunities (Jobs), Generalization, Individual Differences