Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 1 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 4 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 4 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 4 |
Descriptor
Biomedicine | 4 |
Undergraduate Students | 3 |
Engineering Education | 2 |
Innovation | 2 |
Student Interests | 2 |
Teaching Methods | 2 |
Technology | 2 |
Alignment (Education) | 1 |
Best Practices | 1 |
Block Scheduling | 1 |
Career Choice | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
Biomedical Engineering… | 4 |
Author
Lyn Denend | 4 |
Ross Venook | 4 |
Joseph Towles | 2 |
Paul Yock | 2 |
Ravinder D. Pamnani | 2 |
Susie Spielman | 2 |
David Camarillo | 1 |
James Wall | 1 |
Jessica E. Herrmann | 1 |
Kunj Sheth | 1 |
Shiqin Xu | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 4 |
Reports - Research | 4 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 4 |
Postsecondary Education | 4 |
Audience
Location
California (Stanford) | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Lyn Denend; Ross Venook; Ravinder D. Pamnani; Kunj Sheth; Joseph Towles – Biomedical Engineering Education, 2024
In design-oriented biomedical engineering courses, some instructors teach need-driven methods for health technology innovation that use a "need statement" to reflect a student team's hypothesis about the most fruitful direction for their project. While need statements are of the utmost importance to the projects, we were not aware of any…
Descriptors: Scoring Rubrics, Biomedicine, Engineering Education, Student Projects
Jessica E. Herrmann; Susie Spielman; Ross Venook; Paul Yock; Lyn Denend – Biomedical Engineering Education, 2023
Recognizing that traditional textbooks on need-driven health technology innovation were increasingly misaligned with the needs of today's undergraduate biomedical engineering students and the faculty who teach them, we initiated an effort to develop new learning materials for this audience. To guide our efforts, we conducted literature searches on…
Descriptors: Undergraduate Students, Biomedicine, Engineering Education, Multimedia Materials
Lyn Denend; Susie Spielman; Ross Venook; Ravinder D. Pamnani; David Camarillo; James Wall; Joseph Towles – Biomedical Engineering Education, 2023
Many undergraduate educational experiences in biomedical design lack clinical immersion-based needs finding training for students. Convinced of the merits of this type of training for undergraduates, but unable to offer a quarter-long course due to faculty and administrative constraints, we developed an accelerated block-plan course, during which…
Descriptors: Innovation, Educational Experience, Undergraduate Students, Skill Development
Lyn Denend; Shiqin Xu; Paul Yock; Ross Venook – Biomedical Engineering Education, 2021
In the 1990s, interest in biomedical technologies blossomed among students across disciplines. In parallel, there was a push in academia to develop courses enabling interdisciplinary problem solving and more holistic, practice-oriented education. In response, Stanford Biodesign created a graduate course in biomedical technology innovation.…
Descriptors: Biomedicine, Technological Advancement, Medical Education, Innovation