Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Biomedicine | 1 |
| Career Choice | 1 |
| Education Work Relationship | 1 |
| Graduate Students | 1 |
| Holistic Approach | 1 |
| Innovation | 1 |
| Leadership | 1 |
| Medical Education | 1 |
| Student Attitudes | 1 |
| Student Interests | 1 |
| Teaching Methods | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Biomedical Engineering… | 1 |
Author
| Lyn Denend | 1 |
| Paul Yock | 1 |
| Ross Venook | 1 |
| Shiqin Xu | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| California (Stanford) | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkLyn Denend; Shiqin Xu; Paul Yock; Ross Venook – Biomedical Engineering Education, 2021
In the 1990s, interest in biomedical technologies blossomed among students across disciplines. In parallel, there was a push in academia to develop courses enabling interdisciplinary problem solving and more holistic, practice-oriented education. In response, Stanford Biodesign created a graduate course in biomedical technology innovation.…
Descriptors: Biomedicine, Technological Advancement, Medical Education, Innovation
