Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Word Recognition | 2 |
| Agricultural Occupations | 1 |
| Cognitive Processes | 1 |
| Context Clues | 1 |
| Data Analysis | 1 |
| Experimental Psychology | 1 |
| Eye Fixations | 1 |
| Eye Movements | 1 |
| Grammar | 1 |
| Language Processing | 1 |
| Nouns | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Rayner, Keith | 2 |
| Clifton, Charles, Jr. | 1 |
| Grant, Margaret | 1 |
| Slowiaczek, Maria L. | 1 |
| Staub, Adrian | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Opinion Papers | 2 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Direct linkStaub, Adrian; Grant, Margaret; Clifton, Charles, Jr.; Rayner, Keith – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2011
In this brief rejoinder, we respond to Farmer, Monaghan, Misyak, and Christiansen (2011). We argue that the data still do not support the claim that reading time is affected by the phonological typicality of a word for its part of speech. We also question Farmer et al.'s claim that interleaving syntactic structures in an experiment modifies…
Descriptors: Agricultural Occupations, Syntax, Reading, Phonology
Peer reviewedRayner, Keith; Slowiaczek, Maria L. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1981
McClelland and O'Regan's interpretation of data may not be appropriate. One could argue that subjects used different strategies in the expectation and no-expectation conditions. Second, an inappropriate baseline condition may have been used. Finally their results may not be generalizable to the use of parafoveal vision during reading. (Author/RD)
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, Context Clues, Eye Fixations, Eye Movements
