Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Alphabets | 1 |
| Cues | 1 |
| Experiments | 1 |
| Eye Movements | 1 |
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Human Body | 1 |
| Letters (Correspondence) | 1 |
| Memory | 1 |
| Models | 1 |
| Phoneme Grapheme… | 1 |
| Phonology | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Journal of Experimental… | 1 |
Author
| Berry, Raymond W. | 1 |
| Rayner, Keith | 1 |
| Schotter, Elizabeth R. | 1 |
| Slattery, Timothy J. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| California | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkSlattery, Timothy J.; Schotter, Elizabeth R.; Berry, Raymond W.; Rayner, Keith – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2011
The processing of abbreviations in reading was examined with an eye movement experiment. Abbreviations were of 2 distinct types: acronyms (abbreviations that can be read with the normal grapheme-phoneme correspondence [GPC] rules, such as NASA) and initialisms (abbreviations in which the GPCs are letter names, such as NCAA). Parafoveal and foveal…
Descriptors: Sentences, Cues, Letters (Correspondence), Models
