Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 4 |
Descriptor
Source
Educational Leadership | 2 |
ASCD | 1 |
American Educational Research… | 1 |
Applied Measurement in… | 1 |
J Educ Meas | 1 |
Phi Delta Kappan | 1 |
Author
Popham, W. James | 9 |
Husek, T. R. | 1 |
Mehrens, William A. | 1 |
Rose, Janet S. | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 4 |
Opinion Papers | 3 |
Reports - Descriptive | 2 |
Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
Books | 1 |
Guides - Classroom - Teacher | 1 |
Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Researchers | 1 |
Teachers | 1 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Popham, W. James – ASCD, 2018
What is assessment literacy? It is a handful of fundamental understandings about the testing concepts and procedures that influence educational decisions. And it just might be the most cost-effective means of real school improvement. With characteristic humor and aplomb, assessment expert W. James Popham strips away the psychometrician-speak and…
Descriptors: Student Evaluation, Educational Testing, Test Validity, Test Reliability
Popham, W. James – Phi Delta Kappan, 2014
The tests we use to evaluate student achievement may well be sound measures of what students know, but they are faulty indicators at best of how well they have been taught. A remedy to this this situation of judging teachers by the performance of their students on high-stakes tests may be in hand already. We should look to the methods successfully…
Descriptors: High Stakes Tests, Academic Achievement, Teacher Evaluation, Evaluation Methods
Popham, W. James – Educational Leadership, 2006
Assessment for learning involves the frequent, continual use of both formal and informal classroom assessments. It can be as simple as requiring students to respond to a lesson-embedded, one-item quiz as a way of gauging student understanding of what is being taught. Ideally, this innovative approach to classroom assessment is based on a careful…
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Student Evaluation, Performance Based Assessment, Accountability
Popham, W. James – Educational Leadership, 2006
In this article, the author explains the key differences among three kinds of instructionally relevant tests that can have a huge impact on what goes on in classrooms: "instructionally insensitive tests," "instructionally sensitive tests," and "instructionally informative tests." If educators understand the advantages and limitations of these…
Descriptors: Student Evaluation, Educational Testing, Test Construction, Test Validity
Popham, W. James – 1981
Teachers should be evaluated chiefly by the results they produce. Those results will not be properly detected through the use of norm-referenced achievement tests (NRT) due to the following major deficits of NRT: (1) the descriptions of what is measured by NRT are far too loose; (2) evaluative expectations are unclear; (3) the necessity for NRT to…
Descriptors: Criterion Referenced Tests, Norm Referenced Tests, Teacher Evaluation, Test Validity

Popham, W. James – American Educational Research Journal, 1971
Descriptors: Auto Mechanics, Behavioral Objectives, Criterion Referenced Tests, Educational Objectives
Rose, Janet S.; Popham, W. James – 1984
This presentation describes the rationale and major steps in the development of the Teacher's Test of Language Skills (TTLS) to be administered to selected certificated teachers in the Charleston County School District, South Carolina. The paper recounts the factors underlying the establishment of the School Board's policy, then traces the major…
Descriptors: Board of Education Policy, Elementary Secondary Education, Political Issues, Reading Skills
Popham, W. James; Husek, T. R. – J Educ Meas, 1969
Research partially supported by the UCLA Center for the Study of Evaluation of Instructional Programs.
Descriptors: Criterion Referenced Tests, Evaluation Criteria, Item Analysis, Measurement

Mehrens, William A.; Popham, W. James – Applied Measurement in Education, 1992
This paper discusses how to determine whether a test was developed in a legally defensible manner, reviewing general issues, specific cases bearing on different types of test use, some evaluative dimensions, and evidence of test quality. Tests constructed and used according to existing standards will generally stand legal scrutiny. (SLD)
Descriptors: College Entrance Examinations, Compliance (Legal), Constitutional Law, Court Litigation