Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Meta Analysis | 2 |
| Best Practices | 1 |
| Bias | 1 |
| Citations (References) | 1 |
| Coding | 1 |
| Databases | 1 |
| Documentation | 1 |
| Educational Research | 1 |
| Effect Size | 1 |
| Guidelines | 1 |
| Information Dissemination | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Grantee Submission | 2 |
Author
| Polanin, Joshua R. | 2 |
| Espelage, Dorothy L. | 1 |
| Grotpeter, Jennifer K. | 1 |
| Hennessy, Emily A. | 1 |
| Pigott, Terri D. | 1 |
| Tanner-Smith, Emily E. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Download full text
Direct linkPolanin, Joshua R.; Pigott, Terri D.; Espelage, Dorothy L.; Grotpeter, Jennifer K. – Grantee Submission, 2019
Abstract screening is one important aspect of conducting a high-quality and comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis. Abstract screening allows the review team to conduct the tedious but vital first step to synthesize the extant literature: winnowing down the overwhelming amalgamation of citations discovered through research databases to…
Descriptors: Meta Analysis, Citations (References), Documentation, Databases
Polanin, Joshua R.; Tanner-Smith, Emily E.; Hennessy, Emily A. – Grantee Submission, 2016
Practitioners and policymakers rely on meta-analyses to inform decision-making around the allocation of resources to individuals and organizations. It is therefore paramount to consider the validity of these results. A well-documented threat to the validity of research synthesis results is the presence of publication bias, a phenomenon where…
Descriptors: Publications, Periodicals, Bias, Effect Size
