Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 2 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 3 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Growth Models | 3 |
Accuracy | 2 |
Achievement Gains | 2 |
COVID-19 | 2 |
Computation | 2 |
Elementary Secondary Education | 2 |
Pandemics | 2 |
Scores | 2 |
Value Added Models | 2 |
Academic Achievement | 1 |
Economics | 1 |
More ▼ |
Author
Koedel, Cory | 3 |
Parsons, Eric | 3 |
Fazlul, Ishtiaque | 2 |
Qian, Cheng | 2 |
Ehlert, Mark | 1 |
Podgursky, Michael | 1 |
Publication Type
Reports - Research | 3 |
Journal Articles | 2 |
Education Level
Elementary Secondary Education | 2 |
Elementary Education | 1 |
Junior High Schools | 1 |
Middle Schools | 1 |
Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Missouri | 3 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Fazlul, Ishtiaque; Koedel, Cory; Parsons, Eric; Qian, Cheng – AERA Open, 2021
We evaluate the feasibility of estimating test-score growth for schools and districts with a gap year in test data. Our research design uses a simulated gap year in testing when a true test gap did not occur, which facilitates comparisons of district- and school-level growth estimates with and without a gap year. We find that growth estimates…
Descriptors: Scores, Achievement Gains, Computation, School Districts
Fazlul, Ishtiaque; Koedel, Cory; Parsons, Eric; Qian, Cheng – National Center for Analysis of Longitudinal Data in Education Research (CALDER), 2021
We evaluate the feasibility of estimating test-score growth with a gap year in testing data, informing the scenario when state testing resumes after the 2020 COVID-19-induced test stoppage. Our research design is to simulate a gap year in testing using pre-COVID-19 data--when a true test gap did not occur--which facilitates comparisons of…
Descriptors: Scores, Achievement Gains, Computation, Growth Models
Ehlert, Mark; Koedel, Cory; Parsons, Eric; Podgursky, Michael – Educational Policy, 2016
The specifics of how growth models should be constructed and used for educational evaluation is a topic of lively policy debate in states and school districts nationwide. In this article, we take up the question of model choice--framed within a policy context--and examine three competing approaches. The first approach, reflected in the popular…
Descriptors: Growth Models, Value Added Models, Educational Assessment, Elementary Secondary Education